Tennys Sandgren vs Yuichi Sugita — Lahaina CH Round of 32

Lahaina CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 January 2017
hard
JPN3
Yuichi Sugita
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Sandgren T.
6-4 6-4
Sugita Y.
Sandgren T.
662
Sugita Y.
440

Tennys Sandgren defeated Yuichi Sugita 6-4 6-4 in the Lahaina CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Yuichi Sugita came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tennys Sandgren claimed a first win over Yuichi Sugita in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Tennys Sandgren edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-01-19Australian OpenQ1hardYuichi Sugita3-6 6-4 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sugita Y.

Sugita Y.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Sugita Y.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Sugita Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
86
Break points won·Dominant
2
40
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Chung H.[2]
Daniel T.[4]
7-636-1
Semi-finals
Chung H.[2]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Norrie C.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Chung H.[2]
Mmoh M.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-43-66-2
Norrie C.
Sarkissian A.
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-36-1
R16
Laaksonen H.[7]
Takeuchi K.
6-26-2
Krueger M.
Soeda G.
6-23-66-3
Daniel T.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-34-66-2
Norrie C.
Krajicek A.
6-16-3
Sarkissian A.
Li Z.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Paul T.
6-11-66-2
Chung H.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-0
Sandgren T.
Klahn B.
3-66-37-69
R32
Mcdonald M.
Bellier A.
6-26-4
Klahn B.
Ito T.
5-76-36-3
Takeuchi K.
Shapovalov D.
7-653-67-64
Daniel T.[4]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.
Chiudinelli M.[5]
6-45-77-65
Norrie C.
Mcgee J.
4-66-36-4
Sarkissian A.
Donaldson J.[1]
5-77-57-5
Chung H.[2]
Novikov D.
6-36-2
Paul T.
Wu D.
6-26-3
Mmoh M.
Pospisil V.[8]
3-66-46-3
Sandgren T.
Sugita Y.[3]
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Dolezel F.
6-26-0
Soeda G.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-16-1
Krueger M.
Satral J.
3-66-47-62
Zhang Z.
Rubin N.
6-46-2