Tommy Paul vs Di Wu — Lahaina CH Round of 32

Lahaina CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tommy Paul
USA
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 January 2017
hard
CHN
Di Wu
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWLLL
Paul T.
6-2 6-3
Wu D.
Paul T.
662
Wu D.
230

Tommy Paul defeated Di Wu 6-2 6-3 in the Lahaina CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Di Wu came in defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Wu D.

Wu D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paul T.Wu D.
71
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Wu D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
2.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 132). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Wu D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
4
Break points saved·Dominant
99
37
Break points won·Dominant
87
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Wu D.
Freshness·
91
—

Paul T.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Chung H.[2]
Daniel T.[4]
7-636-1
Semi-finals
Chung H.[2]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Norrie C.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Chung H.[2]
Mmoh M.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-43-66-2
Norrie C.
Sarkissian A.
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-36-1
R16
Laaksonen H.[7]
Takeuchi K.
6-26-2
Krueger M.
Soeda G.
6-23-66-3
Daniel T.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-34-66-2
Norrie C.
Krajicek A.
6-16-3
Sarkissian A.
Li Z.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Paul T.
6-11-66-2
Chung H.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-0
Sandgren T.
Klahn B.
3-66-37-69
R32
Mcdonald M.
Bellier A.
6-26-4
Klahn B.
Ito T.
5-76-36-3
Takeuchi K.
Shapovalov D.
7-653-67-64
Daniel T.[4]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.
Chiudinelli M.[5]
6-45-77-65
Norrie C.
Mcgee J.
4-66-36-4
Sarkissian A.
Donaldson J.[1]
5-77-57-5
Chung H.[2]
Novikov D.
6-36-2
Paul T.
Wu D.
6-26-3
Mmoh M.
Pospisil V.[8]
3-66-46-3
Sandgren T.
Sugita Y.[3]
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Dolezel F.
6-26-0
Soeda G.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-16-1
Krueger M.
Satral J.
3-66-47-62
Zhang Z.
Rubin N.
6-46-2