Mitchell Krueger vs Go Soeda — Lahaina CH Round of 16

Lahaina CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 January 2017
hard
JPN
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Krueger M.
6-2 3-6 6-3
Soeda G.
Krueger M.
6362
Soeda G.
2631

Mitchell Krueger defeated Go Soeda 6-2 3-6 6-3 in the Lahaina CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Mitchell Krueger came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. Mitchell Krueger extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-08-27US OpenQ1hardMitchell Krueger6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Soeda G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Soeda G.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Soeda G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
16
23
Break points saved·Dominant
87
61
Break points won·Even
14
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
46
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Soeda G.
Freshness·
87
—

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Chung H.[2]
Daniel T.[4]
7-636-1
Semi-finals
Chung H.[2]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Norrie C.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Chung H.[2]
Mmoh M.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-43-66-2
Norrie C.
Sarkissian A.
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-36-1
R16
Laaksonen H.[7]
Takeuchi K.
6-26-2
Krueger M.
Soeda G.
6-23-66-3
Daniel T.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-34-66-2
Norrie C.
Krajicek A.
6-16-3
Sarkissian A.
Li Z.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Paul T.
6-11-66-2
Chung H.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-0
Sandgren T.
Klahn B.
3-66-37-69
R32
Mcdonald M.
Bellier A.
6-26-4
Klahn B.
Ito T.
5-76-36-3
Takeuchi K.
Shapovalov D.
7-653-67-64
Daniel T.[4]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.
Chiudinelli M.[5]
6-45-77-65
Norrie C.
Mcgee J.
4-66-36-4
Sarkissian A.
Donaldson J.[1]
5-77-57-5
Chung H.[2]
Novikov D.
6-36-2
Paul T.
Wu D.
6-26-3
Mmoh M.
Pospisil V.[8]
3-66-46-3
Sandgren T.
Sugita Y.[3]
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Dolezel F.
6-26-0
Soeda G.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-16-1
Krueger M.
Satral J.
3-66-47-62
Zhang Z.
Rubin N.
6-46-2