Tennys Sandgren vs Bradley Klahn — Lahaina CH Round of 16

Lahaina CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 January 2017
hard
USA
Bradley Klahn
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLL
Sandgren T.
3-6 6-3 7-6
Klahn B.
Sandgren T.
367112
Klahn B.
63691

Tennys Sandgren defeated Bradley Klahn 3-6 6-3 7-6 in the Lahaina CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Bradley Klahn came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Tennys Sandgren claimed a first win over Bradley Klahn in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-10-08Shanghai MastersQ1hardBradley Klahn4-6 6-3 6-4
2018-08-13Cincinnati MastersQ1hardBradley Klahn6-4 7-6(1)

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Klahn B.

Klahn B.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Klahn B.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.6
7.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Klahn B.
Clutch Rating·Even
36
35
Break points saved·Even
92
88
Break points won·Even
2
6
Deciding sets·Even
28
27
Tiebreaks·Even
86
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Chung H.[2]
Daniel T.[4]
7-636-1
Semi-finals
Chung H.[2]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Norrie C.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Chung H.[2]
Mmoh M.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-43-66-2
Norrie C.
Sarkissian A.
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-36-1
R16
Laaksonen H.[7]
Takeuchi K.
6-26-2
Krueger M.
Soeda G.
6-23-66-3
Daniel T.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-34-66-2
Norrie C.
Krajicek A.
6-16-3
Sarkissian A.
Li Z.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Paul T.
6-11-66-2
Chung H.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-0
Sandgren T.
Klahn B.
3-66-37-69
R32
Mcdonald M.
Bellier A.
6-26-4
Klahn B.
Ito T.
5-76-36-3
Takeuchi K.
Shapovalov D.
7-653-67-64
Daniel T.[4]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.
Chiudinelli M.[5]
6-45-77-65
Norrie C.
Mcgee J.
4-66-36-4
Sarkissian A.
Donaldson J.[1]
5-77-57-5
Chung H.[2]
Novikov D.
6-36-2
Paul T.
Wu D.
6-26-3
Mmoh M.
Pospisil V.[8]
3-66-46-3
Sandgren T.
Sugita Y.[3]
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Dolezel F.
6-26-0
Soeda G.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-16-1
Krueger M.
Satral J.
3-66-47-62
Zhang Z.
Rubin N.
6-46-2