Taro Daniel vs Cameron Norrie — Lahaina CH Semi-final

Lahaina CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Taro Daniel
JPN4
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 January 2017
hard
Cameron Norrie
GBR
Cameron Norrie
#38ATP
1829ELO
1789Hard ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Daniel T.
6-4 6-4
Norrie C.
Daniel T.
662
Norrie C.
440

Taro Daniel defeated Cameron Norrie 6-4 6-4 in the Lahaina CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Cameron Norrie came in ranked #38. Taro Daniel extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Taro Daniel edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-03-06Indian Wells MastersR32hardCameron Norrie6-7(5) 7-5 6-2
2018-03-05Indian Wells MastersR128hardTaro Daniel6-3 1-6 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Daniel T.Norrie C.
—
Serve
45
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
5.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
90
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
99
Break points won·Dominant
37
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
18
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
81
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Norrie C.
Freshness·Dominant
59
100

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d) · Norrie C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Chung H.[2]
Daniel T.[4]
7-636-1
Semi-finals
Chung H.[2]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Norrie C.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Chung H.[2]
Mmoh M.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-43-66-2
Norrie C.
Sarkissian A.
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-36-1
R16
Laaksonen H.[7]
Takeuchi K.
6-26-2
Krueger M.
Soeda G.
6-23-66-3
Daniel T.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-34-66-2
Norrie C.
Krajicek A.
6-16-3
Sarkissian A.
Li Z.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Paul T.
6-11-66-2
Chung H.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-0
Sandgren T.
Klahn B.
3-66-37-69
R32
Mcdonald M.
Bellier A.
6-26-4
Klahn B.
Ito T.
5-76-36-3
Takeuchi K.
Shapovalov D.
7-653-67-64
Daniel T.[4]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.
Chiudinelli M.[5]
6-45-77-65
Norrie C.
Mcgee J.
4-66-36-4
Sarkissian A.
Donaldson J.[1]
5-77-57-5
Chung H.[2]
Novikov D.
6-36-2
Paul T.
Wu D.
6-26-3
Mmoh M.
Pospisil V.[8]
3-66-46-3
Sandgren T.
Sugita Y.[3]
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Dolezel F.
6-26-0
Soeda G.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-16-1
Krueger M.
Satral J.
3-66-47-62
Zhang Z.
Rubin N.
6-46-2