Hyeon Chung vs Taro Daniel — Lahaina CH Final

Lahaina CH · CHALLENGER · Final
KOR2
Hyeon Chung
#573ATP
1488ELO
1459Hard ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 January 2017
hard
Taro Daniel
JPN4
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
Chung H.
7-6 6-1
Daniel T.
Chung H.
7762
Daniel T.
6310

Hyeon Chung defeated Taro Daniel 7-6 6-1 in the Lahaina CH final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Hyeon Chung came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chung H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Chung H.

Serve advantage — Chung H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chung H.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (195 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chung H.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
42
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
93
Break points won·Slight edge
43
37
Deciding sets·Even
21
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Chung H.Daniel T.
Freshness·
—
59

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Chung H.[2]
Daniel T.[4]
7-636-1
Semi-finals
Chung H.[2]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Norrie C.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Chung H.[2]
Mmoh M.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-43-66-2
Norrie C.
Sarkissian A.
6-16-3
Daniel T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-36-1
R16
Laaksonen H.[7]
Takeuchi K.
6-26-2
Krueger M.
Soeda G.
6-23-66-3
Daniel T.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-34-66-2
Norrie C.
Krajicek A.
6-16-3
Sarkissian A.
Li Z.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Paul T.
6-11-66-2
Chung H.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-0
Sandgren T.
Klahn B.
3-66-37-69
R32
Mcdonald M.
Bellier A.
6-26-4
Klahn B.
Ito T.
5-76-36-3
Takeuchi K.
Shapovalov D.
7-653-67-64
Daniel T.[4]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.
Chiudinelli M.[5]
6-45-77-65
Norrie C.
Mcgee J.
4-66-36-4
Sarkissian A.
Donaldson J.[1]
5-77-57-5
Chung H.[2]
Novikov D.
6-36-2
Paul T.
Wu D.
6-26-3
Mmoh M.
Pospisil V.[8]
3-66-46-3
Sandgren T.
Sugita Y.[3]
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.[7]
Dolezel F.
6-26-0
Soeda G.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-16-1
Krueger M.
Satral J.
3-66-47-62
Zhang Z.
Rubin N.
6-46-2