Quentin Halys vs Radu Albot — Canberra CH Round of 32
Canberra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2017
hard
Halys Q.6-1 6-4
Albot R.
Halys Q.
662
Albot R.
140
Quentin Halys defeated Radu Albot 6-1 6-4 in the Canberra CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90, defending last year's quarter-final. Quentin Halys claimed a first win over Radu Albot in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.
Key context
- Match story: Quentin Halys dropped just 5 games past Radu Albot.
Head to head
0–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-06 | Stuttgart | Q2 | grass | Radu Albot | 1-2 RET |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Serve & return on hard
Halys Q.Albot R.
39
Serve
—
26
Return
—
Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
79%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
3.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Semi-finals
Sela D.[8]
Falla A.
6-42-66-1
Struff J.[1]
Darcis S.[6]
7-656-3
Daniel T.[2]
Bolt A.
7-626-2
Ebden M.[3]
Polmans M.
5-76-16-4
Quarter-finals
Sela D.[8]
Groth S.
7-656-2
Falla A.
Berlocq C.[7]
6-27-5
Darcis S.[6]
Shapovalov D.
6-07-64
Struff J.[1]
Kravchuk K.[5]
6-46-766-3
Polmans M.
Sarkissian A.
7-636-3
Daniel T.[2]
Jasika O.[8]
7-606-4
Bolt A.
Van Peperzeel G.
6-46-4
Ebden M.[3]
Ellis B.
6-27-63
R16
Groth S.
Melzer G.[2]
4-66-47-62
Sela D.[8]
Moraing M.
6-36-2
Falla A.
Olivo R.[4]
6-16-747-63
Berlocq C.[7]
Halys Q.
7-666-706-4
Darcis S.[6]
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-26-4
Kravchuk K.[5]
Vukic A.
6-47-61
Struff J.[1]
Harris A.
6-13-66-4
Shapovalov D.
Herbert P.[3]
3-66-46-4
Van Peperzeel G.
Saville L.
6-37-63
Polmans M.
Mitchell B.
6-22-67-5
Sarkissian A.
Harris A.
6-16-4
Daniel T.[2]
Banes M.
6-17-64
Bolt A.
Fanselow S.
6-17-64
Ebden M.[3]
Statham J.
6-26-1
Jasika O.[8]
Kubler J.
6-26-3
Ellis B.
King E.[5]
4-66-16-4
R32
Melzer G.[2]
Nolan D.
4-67-57-66
Groth S.
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-717-686-3
Moraing M.
Molteni A.
6-46-0
Sela D.[8]
Margaroli L.
6-16-1
Olivo R.[4]
Delaney J.
6-25-77-5
Falla A.
Kelly D.
7-666-2
Berlocq C.[7]
De Waard S.
6-36-3
Darcis S.[6]
Moutet C.
6-16-1
Podlipnik Castillo H.
Puttergill C.
6-36-3
Shapovalov D.
Watanuki Y.
6-776-46-4
Herbert P.[3]
Popyrin A.
7-626-4
Kravchuk K.[5]
Pasha N.
7-656-3
Vukic A.
Frawley J.
6-746-26-2
Harris A.
Fancutt T.
7-636-4
Struff J.[1]
Walkin B.
6-46-4
Halys Q.
Albot R.
6-16-4
Daniel T.[2]
Ghem A.
7-56-2
Banes M.
Whittington A.
6-756-36-2
Kubler J.
Puttergill C.
7-626-1
Bolt A.
Grills J.
6-46-4
Fanselow S.
Rubin N.[6]
6-36-2
King E.[5]
Mousley B.
7-666-3
Statham J.
Barton M.
6-47-64
Mitchell B.
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Polmans M.
Kelly D.
3-67-646-3
Harris A.
Oconnell C.
6-37-65
Jasika O.[8]
Bourchier H.
6-47-65
Ebden M.[3]
Klein B.
6-36-4
Sarkissian A.
Nkomba B.
6-03-0
Ellis B.
Miedler L.
7-56-2
Van Peperzeel G.
Propoggia D.
6-36-4
Saville L.
Krueger M.[4]
6-27-5