Alison Riske Amritraj vs Lin ZhuShenzhen Round of 32

Shenzhen · WTA · Round of 32
36 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 January 2017
hard
#130WTA
1674ELO
1647Hard ELO
32 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Riske Amritraj A.
7-6 7-6
Zhu L.
Riske Amritraj A.
77772
Zhu L.
65650

Alison Riske Amritraj defeated Lin Zhu 7-6 7-6 in the Shenzhen round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Alison Riske Amritraj came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's final. Alison Riske Amritraj extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

10
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-20Australian OpenR64hardAlison Riske Amritraj6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Riske Amritraj A.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Zhu L.

Zhu L.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Riske Amritraj A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Riske Amritraj A.Zhu L.
Serve
14
Return
60

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
66%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.3
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
19
37
Break points saved·Even
61
64
Break points won·Dominant
60
91
Deciding sets·Clear edge
27
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
65

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·
100

Zhu L.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast