Stefan Kozlov vs Dominik Koepfer — Columbus CH Round of 16

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Stefan Kozlov
USA4
Stefan Kozlov
#296ATP
1429ELO
1408Hard ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 November 2016
hard
GER
Dominik Koepfer
#1085ATP
32 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLWW
Kozlov S.
6-3 6-4
Koepfer D.
Kozlov S.
662
Koepfer D.
340

Stefan Kozlov defeated Dominik Koepfer 6-3 6-4 in the Columbus CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Stefan Kozlov came in ranked #296, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Stefan Kozlov closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kozlov S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Koepfer D.

Koepfer D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kozlov S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kozlov S.Koepfer D.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.4
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kozlov S.Koepfer D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
71
Break points saved·Dominant
49
94
Break points won·Slight edge
20
28
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kozlov S.Koepfer D.
Freshness·
69
—

Kozlov S.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Torpegaard M.
Becker B.[1]
6-41-66-2
Kozlov S.[4]
Sandgren T.[6]
6-12-66-2
Semi-finals
Torpegaard M.
Sandgren T.
7-57-65
Becker B.[1]
Smith J.
6-41-67-5
Sandgren T.[6]
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-25-76-4
Kozlov S.[4]
Barry S.[8]
7-57-66
Quarter-finals
Sandgren T.
Quiroz R.
6-07-63
Torpegaard M.
Austin G.
6-27-5
Smith J.
Bangoura S.
6-33-66-3
Becker B.[1]
Libietis M.
4-66-17-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Norrie C.
6-26-736-3
Laaksonen H.[3]
Kobelt P.
6-47-5
Kozlov S.[4]
King K.
6-27-5
Barry S.[8]
Fritz T.[1]
6-47-62
R16
Quiroz R.
King E.
6-46-4
Sandgren T.
Rola B.[7]
7-636-3
Torpegaard M.
Polansky P.[4]
6-46-726-4
Austin G.
Dancevic F.
7-646-3
Smith J.
Hurkacz H.
6-26-3
Libietis M.
Norrie C.
6-47-65
Becker B.[1]
Groth S.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.
Paul T.
6-36-3
Norrie C.
Bambridge L.
7-636-4
Sandgren T.[6]
Quigley E.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[3]
Mcnally J.
6-46-3
Kobelt P.
Krueger M.[5]
7-656-4
King K.
Harrison C.
6-36-3
Kozlov S.[4]
Koepfer D.
6-36-4
Barry S.[8]
Nevolo D.
6-46-2
Fritz T.[1]
Libietis M.
6-36-3
R32
Norrie C.
Escobedo E.[5]
7-641-0
King E.
Novikov D.[2]
6-46-757-62
Quiroz R.
Klein B.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.
Bester P.
6-46-4
Rola B.[7]
Scholtz N.
6-36-2
Polansky P.[4]
Gomez E.
7-56-4
Torpegaard M.
Meister N.
6-46-3
Austin G.
Joyce M.
6-46-2
Dancevic F.
Clezar G.[8]
6-26-4
Smith J.
Arevalo M.[6]
6-16-1
Hurkacz H.
Glasspool L.
6-47-5
Paul T.
Mcnally J.
6-36-3
Bangoura S.
Krajicek A.[3]
6-26-3
Libietis M.
Wolf J.
6-37-64
Groth S.
Hiltzik J.
6-37-66
Becker B.[1]
Quigley E.
7-56-4
Bambridge L.
Crepaldi E.
6-36-2
Norrie C.
Sarmiento R.
6-47-611
Quigley E.
Hiltzik A.
6-736-36-2
Sandgren T.[6]
Carter A.
6-26-2
Laaksonen H.[3]
Aragone J.
6-36-3
Mcnally J.
Pollanen H.
6-16-3
Kobelt P.
Vorster T.
6-47-5
Krueger M.[5]
Callahan H.
6-46-3
Harrison C.
Krajicek A.[7]
6-27-5
King K.
Joyce M.
7-656-2
Koepfer D.
Giron M.
7-636-4
Kozlov S.[4]
Statham J.
6-27-66
Barry S.[8]
Kirchheimer S.
7-56-4
Nevolo D.
Hiltzik J.
6-766-36-4
Libietis M.
Di Feo H.
5-76-27-63
Fritz T.[1]
Torpegaard M.
7-636-1