Michael Mmoh vs Stefan Kozlov — Champaign CH Round of 16

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 November 2016
hard
Stefan Kozlov
USA3
Stefan Kozlov
#296ATP
1429ELO
1408Hard ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
Mmoh M.
6-1 6-4
Kozlov S.
Mmoh M.
662
Kozlov S.
140

Michael Mmoh defeated Stefan Kozlov 6-1 6-4 in the Champaign CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Michael Mmoh came in ranked #188, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kozlov S.

Kozlov S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Kozlov S.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
2.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.8
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Kozlov S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
36
Break points saved·Dominant
91
49
Break points won·Slight edge
31
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
90
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Kozlov S.
Freshness·Dominant
95
69

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Kozlov S.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Laaksonen H.[2]
Bemelmans R.[6]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Laaksonen H.[2]
Eubanks C.
7-636-766-4
Bemelmans R.[6]
Donaldson J.[1]
7-616-3
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.
Mmoh M.
W/O
Bemelmans R.[6]
Baker B.
6-31-0
Laaksonen H.[2]
Giron M.
6-46-2
Donaldson J.[1]
Klahn B.
6-46-4
R16
Laaksonen H.[2]
Hiltzik J.
1-66-17-5
Giron M.
Opelka R.[8]
6-27-64
Mmoh M.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-16-4
Eubanks C.
Bangoura S.
6-13-66-1
Bemelmans R.[6]
Krueger M.
7-656-2
Baker B.
Broady L.
6-46-1
Klahn B.
Sandgren T.
4-66-36-4
Donaldson J.[1]
Shane R.
6-26-4
R32
Klahn B.
Groth S.[5]
7-650-0
Bangoura S.
Van Rijthoven T.
3-66-47-65
Laaksonen H.[2]
Sarmiento R.
6-716-36-4
Hiltzik J.
Bhambri Y.
6-36-1
Giron M.
Barry S.
6-36-4
Opelka R.[8]
Corrie E.
6-736-36-4
Kozlov S.[3]
Krajicek A.
6-47-63
Mmoh M.
Libietis M.
6-16-4
Eubanks C.
Rubin N.[7]
7-656-3
Bemelmans R.[6]
Norrie C.
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Torpegaard M.
6-47-65
Baker B.
Quigley E.
6-756-27-64
Broady L.
De Loore J.[4]
6-36-4
Sandgren T.
Hiltzik A.
6-16-2
Shane R.
Khlif N.
6-26-4
Donaldson J.[1]
Cox D.
6-46-3