Lukas Lacko vs Quentin Halys — Budapest CH Round of 16

Budapest CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
SVK6
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2016
hard
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLLLWW
Lacko L.
6-2 6-2
Halys Q.
Lacko L.
662
Halys Q.
220

Lukas Lacko defeated Quentin Halys 6-2 6-2 in the Budapest CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lacko L.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Lacko L.Halys Q.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Lacko L.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.3
11.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lacko L.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
57
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
97
Break points won·Even
8
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Lacko L.Halys Q.
Freshness·
—
93

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Copil M.
Darcis S.[4]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Darcis S.[4]
De Schepper K.
2-66-46-3
Copil M.
Medvedev D.[5]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Darcis S.[4]
Istomin D.[7]
6-20-0
Copil M.
Fucsovics M.
7-56-3
Medvedev D.[5]
Robredo T.
7-56-2
De Schepper K.
Lacko L.[6]
6-43-67-5
R16
Lacko L.[6]
Halys Q.
6-26-2
Darcis S.[4]
Djere L.
6-37-5
Istomin D.[7]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Copil M.
Millot V.[8]
7-666-1
Robredo T.
Herbert P.[1]
6-26-756-3
De Schepper K.
Przysiezny M.
6-33-66-2
Fucsovics M.
Fabbiano T.[3]
4-66-26-1
Medvedev D.[5]
Rublev A.
6-36-2
R32
Halys Q.
Lamasine T.
6-46-1
Lacko L.[6]
Ivashka I.
3-66-36-2
Przysiezny M.
Martin A.[2]
4-67-696-4
Gombos N.
Nagy P.
6-736-26-4
Istomin D.[7]
Brands D.
6-26-3
Copil M.
Tepavac M.
6-26-4
Fabbiano T.[3]
Vanni L.
6-31-66-4
Medvedev D.[5]
Lopez Perez E.
6-36-4
Rublev A.
Stebe C.
7-55-76-4
Herbert P.[1]
Krstin P.
6-35-77-5
Millot V.[8]
Ilkel C.
6-36-4
Fucsovics M.
Basic M.
6-36-1
Darcis S.[4]
Ilhan M.
6-46-2
Robredo T.
Diez S.
7-666-757-5
De Schepper K.
Pavic A.
7-656-1
Djere L.
Gaio F.
7-56-3