Thomas Fabbiano vs Luca Vanni — Budapest CH Round of 32

Budapest CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA3
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 October 2016
hard
ITA
Luca Vanni
41 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLL
Fabbiano T.
6-3 1-6 6-4
Vanni L.
Fabbiano T.
6162
Vanni L.
3641

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Luca Vanni 6-3 1-6 6-4 in the Budapest CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Luca Vanni came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Thomas Fabbiano claimed a first win over Luca Vanni in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Thomas Fabbiano closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–4.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-05-24Roland GarrosQ2clayLuca Vanni3-6 6-3 6-2
2015-01-05ChennaiQ2hardLuca Vanni6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Vanni L.

Vanni L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Vanni L.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
9.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Vanni L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
28
17
Break points saved·Even
81
81
Break points won·Clear edge
16
2
Deciding sets·Even
28
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Copil M.
Darcis S.[4]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Darcis S.[4]
De Schepper K.
2-66-46-3
Copil M.
Medvedev D.[5]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Darcis S.[4]
Istomin D.[7]
6-20-0
Copil M.
Fucsovics M.
7-56-3
Medvedev D.[5]
Robredo T.
7-56-2
De Schepper K.
Lacko L.[6]
6-43-67-5
R16
Lacko L.[6]
Halys Q.
6-26-2
Darcis S.[4]
Djere L.
6-37-5
Istomin D.[7]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Copil M.
Millot V.[8]
7-666-1
Robredo T.
Herbert P.[1]
6-26-756-3
De Schepper K.
Przysiezny M.
6-33-66-2
Fucsovics M.
Fabbiano T.[3]
4-66-26-1
Medvedev D.[5]
Rublev A.
6-36-2
R32
Halys Q.
Lamasine T.
6-46-1
Lacko L.[6]
Ivashka I.
3-66-36-2
Przysiezny M.
Martin A.[2]
4-67-696-4
Gombos N.
Nagy P.
6-736-26-4
Istomin D.[7]
Brands D.
6-26-3
Copil M.
Tepavac M.
6-26-4
Fabbiano T.[3]
Vanni L.
6-31-66-4
Medvedev D.[5]
Lopez Perez E.
6-36-4
Rublev A.
Stebe C.
7-55-76-4
Herbert P.[1]
Krstin P.
6-35-77-5
Millot V.[8]
Ilkel C.
6-36-4
Fucsovics M.
Basic M.
6-36-1
Darcis S.[4]
Ilhan M.
6-46-2
Robredo T.
Diez S.
7-666-757-5
De Schepper K.
Pavic A.
7-656-1
Djere L.
Gaio F.
7-56-3