Daniel Masur vs Ti Chen — Ningbo CH Round of 32

Ningbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Daniel Masur
GER
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 October 2016
hard
TPE
Ti Chen
42 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
Masur D.
6-4 6-4
Chen T.
Masur D.
662
Chen T.
440

Daniel Masur defeated Ti Chen 6-4 6-4 in the Ningbo CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Daniel Masur came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Masur edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Masur D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Chen T.

Chen T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Serve advantage — Masur D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Masur D.Chen T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.4
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Masur D.Chen T.
Clutch Rating·Even
10
14
Break points saved·Dominant
73
39
Break points won·Clear edge
5
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
15
39
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
13
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Masur D.Chen T.
Freshness·
100
—

Masur D.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Lu Y.[2]
Moriya H.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Lu Y.[2]
Chung H.[6]
6-737-676-2
Moriya H.
Millman J.[1]
6-24-3
Quarter-finals
Lu Y.[2]
Kozlov S.[7]
3-66-46-4
Chung H.[6]
Kim C.
6-36-4
Moriya H.
Lee D.[8]
6-26-2
Millman J.[1]
Soeda G.[5]
6-36-4
R16
Lu Y.[2]
Kudryavtsev A.
7-56-4
Kozlov S.[7]
Wu D.
7-646-3
Kim C.
Doumbia S.
6-46-4
Moriya H.
Uchiyama Y.
2-66-46-4
Millman J.[1]
Gojowczyk P.
7-666-2
Chung H.[6]
Wu Y.
6-16-1
Lee D.[8]
Masur D.
6-36-1
Soeda G.[5]
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-0
R32
Masur D.
Chen T.
6-46-4
Lu Y.[2]
Eysseric J.
6-27-63
Kozlov S.[7]
Wang J.
6-26-4
Kim C.
Matosevic M.
6-37-65
Lee D.[8]
Hanfmann Y.
6-26-4
Moriya H.
Whittington A.
7-647-5
Uchiyama Y.
Stakhovsky S.[4]
6-46-3
Gojowczyk P.
Santillan A.
6-27-63
Millman J.[1]
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Soeda G.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-43-66-2
Sekiguchi S.
Sun F.
6-37-5
Kudryavtsev A.
Kibi Y.
7-604-66-3
Wu D.
Riba P.
6-36-4
Doumbia S.
Wang C.
6-27-5
Wu Y.
Kwon S.
6-707-6106-4
Chung H.[6]
Zhang Z.
7-656-4