Jordan Thompson vs Sergiy Stakhovsky — Ho Chi Minh CH Quarter-final

Ho Chi Minh CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jordan Thompson
AUS4
Jordan Thompson
#156ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2016
hard
UKR5
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
Thompson J.
6-4 6-7 6-2
Stakhovsky S.
Thompson J.
66462
Stakhovsky S.
47721

Jordan Thompson defeated Sergiy Stakhovsky 6-4 6-7 6-2 in the Ho Chi Minh CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jordan Thompson closed it out in three sets, 6–4 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Stakhovsky S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Stakhovsky S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Even
7.2
7.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Stakhovsky S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
41
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
88
Break points won·Clear edge
24
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[4]
Soeda G.[6]
5-77-56-1
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[4]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-24-66-4
Soeda G.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[4]
Stakhovsky S.[5]
6-46-746-2
Soeda G.[6]
Daniel T.[3]
6-36-2
Laaksonen H.[7]
Gojowczyk P.
7-687-5
Uchiyama Y.
Ito T.[8]
6-36-4
R16
Gojowczyk P.
Sela D.[2]
6-17-63
Thompson J.[4]
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-3
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Singh S.
6-17-5
Soeda G.[6]
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-36-2
Ito T.[8]
Ly N.
6-26-1
Uchiyama Y.
Santillan A.
6-26-4
Daniel T.[3]
Myneni S.
6-10-0
Laaksonen H.[7]
Matosevic M.
2-66-46-3
R32
Sela D.[2]
Masur D.
0-66-26-3
Thompson J.[4]
Rochette L.
6-26-3
Sekiguchi S.
Hoang T.
6-16-3
Singh S.
Kibi Y.
6-46-4
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Hanfmann Y.
6-36-4
Daniel T.[3]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Ito T.[8]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-36-736-1
Ly N.
Tabatruong M.
6-46-4
Santillan A.
Moriya H.
6-46-0
Uchiyama Y.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-13-67-63
Gunneswaran P.
Arnaboldi A.
7-613-2
Matosevic M.
Wang J.
6-26-2
Laaksonen H.[7]
Krueger M.
6-46-1
Soeda G.[6]
Rungkat C.
5-76-36-1
Myneni S.
Whittington A.
6-26-4
Gojowczyk P.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-61