Jordan Thompson vs Henri Laaksonen — Ho Chi Minh CH Semi-final

Ho Chi Minh CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Jordan Thompson
AUS4
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2016
hard
SUI7
Henri Laaksonen
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Thompson J.
6-2 4-6 6-4
Laaksonen H.
Thompson J.
6462
Laaksonen H.
2641

Jordan Thompson defeated Henri Laaksonen 6-2 4-6 6-4 in the Ho Chi Minh CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jordan Thompson came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Jordan Thompson closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-10-09Shanghai MastersQ2hardJordan Thompson6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Laaksonen H.

Laaksonen H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve advantage — Thompson J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Laaksonen H.
1st serve in·Even
60%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Laaksonen H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
84
Break points won·Even
24
20
Deciding sets·Even
91
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[4]
Soeda G.[6]
5-77-56-1
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[4]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-24-66-4
Soeda G.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[4]
Stakhovsky S.[5]
6-46-746-2
Soeda G.[6]
Daniel T.[3]
6-36-2
Laaksonen H.[7]
Gojowczyk P.
7-687-5
Uchiyama Y.
Ito T.[8]
6-36-4
R16
Gojowczyk P.
Sela D.[2]
6-17-63
Thompson J.[4]
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-3
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Singh S.
6-17-5
Soeda G.[6]
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-36-2
Ito T.[8]
Ly N.
6-26-1
Uchiyama Y.
Santillan A.
6-26-4
Daniel T.[3]
Myneni S.
6-10-0
Laaksonen H.[7]
Matosevic M.
2-66-46-3
R32
Sela D.[2]
Masur D.
0-66-26-3
Thompson J.[4]
Rochette L.
6-26-3
Sekiguchi S.
Hoang T.
6-16-3
Singh S.
Kibi Y.
6-46-4
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Hanfmann Y.
6-36-4
Daniel T.[3]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Ito T.[8]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-36-736-1
Ly N.
Tabatruong M.
6-46-4
Santillan A.
Moriya H.
6-46-0
Uchiyama Y.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-13-67-63
Gunneswaran P.
Arnaboldi A.
7-613-2
Matosevic M.
Wang J.
6-26-2
Laaksonen H.[7]
Krueger M.
6-46-1
Soeda G.[6]
Rungkat C.
5-76-36-1
Myneni S.
Whittington A.
6-26-4
Gojowczyk P.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-61