Henri Laaksonen vs Mitchell Krueger — Ho Chi Minh CH Round of 32

Ho Chi Minh CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI7
Henri Laaksonen
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2016
hard
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Laaksonen H.
6-4 6-1
Krueger M.
Laaksonen H.
662
Krueger M.
410

Henri Laaksonen defeated Mitchell Krueger 6-4 6-1 in the Ho Chi Minh CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Henri Laaksonen came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Henri Laaksonen extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-04-08HoustonQ2clayHenri Laaksonen6-3 5-7 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Laaksonen H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Laaksonen H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Laaksonen H.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.5
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Laaksonen H.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
16
Break points saved·Even
84
87
Break points won·Slight edge
20
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
25
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Laaksonen H.Krueger M.
Freshness·
—
87

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[4]
Soeda G.[6]
5-77-56-1
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[4]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-24-66-4
Soeda G.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[4]
Stakhovsky S.[5]
6-46-746-2
Soeda G.[6]
Daniel T.[3]
6-36-2
Laaksonen H.[7]
Gojowczyk P.
7-687-5
Uchiyama Y.
Ito T.[8]
6-36-4
R16
Gojowczyk P.
Sela D.[2]
6-17-63
Thompson J.[4]
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-3
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Singh S.
6-17-5
Soeda G.[6]
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-36-2
Ito T.[8]
Ly N.
6-26-1
Uchiyama Y.
Santillan A.
6-26-4
Daniel T.[3]
Myneni S.
6-10-0
Laaksonen H.[7]
Matosevic M.
2-66-46-3
R32
Sela D.[2]
Masur D.
0-66-26-3
Thompson J.[4]
Rochette L.
6-26-3
Sekiguchi S.
Hoang T.
6-16-3
Singh S.
Kibi Y.
6-46-4
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Hanfmann Y.
6-36-4
Daniel T.[3]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Ito T.[8]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-36-736-1
Ly N.
Tabatruong M.
6-46-4
Santillan A.
Moriya H.
6-46-0
Uchiyama Y.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-13-67-63
Gunneswaran P.
Arnaboldi A.
7-613-2
Matosevic M.
Wang J.
6-26-2
Laaksonen H.[7]
Krueger M.
6-46-1
Soeda G.[6]
Rungkat C.
5-76-36-1
Myneni S.
Whittington A.
6-26-4
Gojowczyk P.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-61