Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Yannick Hanfmann — Ho Chi Minh CH Round of 32

Ho Chi Minh CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
UKR5
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2016
hard
Yannick Hanfmann
GER
Yannick Hanfmann
#51ATP
1781ELO
1721Hard ELO
$596kYTD
$4.5MCAREER
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Stakhovsky S.
6-3 6-4
Hanfmann Y.
Stakhovsky S.
662
Hanfmann Y.
340

Sergiy Stakhovsky defeated Yannick Hanfmann 6-3 6-4 in the Ho Chi Minh CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stakhovsky S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Hanfmann Y.

Hanfmann Y.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Stakhovsky S.Hanfmann Y.
—
Serve
58
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Stakhovsky S.Hanfmann Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.3
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stakhovsky S.Hanfmann Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
40
61
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
95
Break points won·Clear edge
3
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
59
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Stakhovsky S.Hanfmann Y.
Freshness·
—
93

Hanfmann Y.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[4]
Soeda G.[6]
5-77-56-1
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[4]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-24-66-4
Soeda G.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[4]
Stakhovsky S.[5]
6-46-746-2
Soeda G.[6]
Daniel T.[3]
6-36-2
Laaksonen H.[7]
Gojowczyk P.
7-687-5
Uchiyama Y.
Ito T.[8]
6-36-4
R16
Gojowczyk P.
Sela D.[2]
6-17-63
Thompson J.[4]
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-3
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Singh S.
6-17-5
Soeda G.[6]
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-36-2
Ito T.[8]
Ly N.
6-26-1
Uchiyama Y.
Santillan A.
6-26-4
Daniel T.[3]
Myneni S.
6-10-0
Laaksonen H.[7]
Matosevic M.
2-66-46-3
R32
Sela D.[2]
Masur D.
0-66-26-3
Thompson J.[4]
Rochette L.
6-26-3
Sekiguchi S.
Hoang T.
6-16-3
Singh S.
Kibi Y.
6-46-4
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Hanfmann Y.
6-36-4
Daniel T.[3]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Ito T.[8]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-36-736-1
Ly N.
Tabatruong M.
6-46-4
Santillan A.
Moriya H.
6-46-0
Uchiyama Y.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-13-67-63
Gunneswaran P.
Arnaboldi A.
7-613-2
Matosevic M.
Wang J.
6-26-2
Laaksonen H.[7]
Krueger M.
6-46-1
Soeda G.[6]
Rungkat C.
5-76-36-1
Myneni S.
Whittington A.
6-26-4
Gojowczyk P.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-61