Taro Daniel vs Stefan Kozlov — Ho Chi Minh CH Round of 32

Ho Chi Minh CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Taro Daniel
JPN3
Taro Daniel
#203ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2016
hard
Stefan Kozlov
USA
Stefan Kozlov
#317ATP
1429ELO
1408Hard ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
Daniel T.
6-4 6-3
Kozlov S.
Daniel T.
662
Kozlov S.
430

Taro Daniel defeated Stefan Kozlov 6-4 6-3 in the Ho Chi Minh CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Taro Daniel closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kozlov S.

Kozlov S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Serve advantage — Kozlov S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Kozlov S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Kozlov S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
36
Break points saved·Dominant
93
49
Break points won·Clear edge
37
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Kozlov S.
Freshness·Clear edge
72
59

Daniel T.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d) · Kozlov S.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 106 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[4]
Soeda G.[6]
5-77-56-1
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[4]
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-24-66-4
Soeda G.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[4]
Stakhovsky S.[5]
6-46-746-2
Soeda G.[6]
Daniel T.[3]
6-36-2
Laaksonen H.[7]
Gojowczyk P.
7-687-5
Uchiyama Y.
Ito T.[8]
6-36-4
R16
Gojowczyk P.
Sela D.[2]
6-17-63
Thompson J.[4]
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-3
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Singh S.
6-17-5
Soeda G.[6]
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-36-2
Ito T.[8]
Ly N.
6-26-1
Uchiyama Y.
Santillan A.
6-26-4
Daniel T.[3]
Myneni S.
6-10-0
Laaksonen H.[7]
Matosevic M.
2-66-46-3
R32
Sela D.[2]
Masur D.
0-66-26-3
Thompson J.[4]
Rochette L.
6-26-3
Sekiguchi S.
Hoang T.
6-16-3
Singh S.
Kibi Y.
6-46-4
Stakhovsky S.[5]
Hanfmann Y.
6-36-4
Daniel T.[3]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Ito T.[8]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-36-736-1
Ly N.
Tabatruong M.
6-46-4
Santillan A.
Moriya H.
6-46-0
Uchiyama Y.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-13-67-63
Gunneswaran P.
Arnaboldi A.
7-613-2
Matosevic M.
Wang J.
6-26-2
Laaksonen H.[7]
Krueger M.
6-46-1
Soeda G.[6]
Rungkat C.
5-76-36-1
Myneni S.
Whittington A.
6-26-4
Gojowczyk P.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-61