Frances Tiafoe vs Noah Rubin — Stockton CH Final

Stockton CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Frances Tiafoe
USA3
Frances Tiafoe
#17ATP
1918ELO
1861Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2016
hard
USA
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Tiafoe F.
6-4 6-2
Rubin N.
Tiafoe F.
662
Rubin N.
420

Frances Tiafoe defeated Noah Rubin 6-4 6-2 in the Stockton CH final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tiafoe F.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Rubin N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Serve advantage — Tiafoe F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tiafoe F.Rubin N.
38
Serve
—
37
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tiafoe F.Rubin N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tiafoe F.Rubin N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
83
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
80
Break points won·Dominant
57
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
54
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
98
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Tiafoe F.Rubin N.
Freshness·
82
—

Tiafoe F.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[3]
Rubin N.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[3]
Mcdonald M.
7-646-3
Rubin N.
Mmoh M.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.
King D.
6-46-4
Rubin N.
Dancevic F.
4-66-26-3
Mcdonald M.
Kudla D.[5]
3-67-616-4
Tiafoe F.[3]
Giannessi A.[6]
7-656-3
R16
Mcdonald M.
Smyczek T.[2]
6-46-4
Kudla D.[5]
Baker B.
5-76-47-5
Tiafoe F.[3]
Nevolo D.
7-666-3
Giannessi A.[6]
Nguyen D.
4-67-57-5
King D.
Arevalo M.
2-66-36-3
Mmoh M.
Caruso S.
6-36-2
Dancevic F.
Klein B.
6-46-4
Rubin N.
De Loore J.
7-53-66-1
R32
Klein B.
Halys Q.[8]
2-66-46-1
Smyczek T.[2]
Zemlja G.
6-43-66-1
Baker B.
Polansky P.
7-633-67-5
Kudla D.[5]
Meister N.
7-676-2
Tiafoe F.[3]
Rola B.
3-67-56-3
Nevolo D.
Nielsen F.
6-46-2
Mmoh M.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-1
King D.
Bangoura S.
6-06-3
Mcdonald M.
Verbeek S.
6-26-2
Nguyen D.
Bhambri Y.
2-66-46-3
Giannessi A.[6]
Chamba Gomez J.
6-16-4
Caruso S.
Novikov D.[7]
6-26-3
Arevalo M.
Giraldo S.[4]
6-32-66-4
Dancevic F.
Paul T.
6-26-2
Rubin N.
Clezar G.
2-66-36-3
De Loore J.
Fratangelo B.[1]
3-66-37-5