Noah Rubin vs Michael Mmoh — Stockton CH Semi-final

Stockton CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
USA
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2016
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Rubin N.
6-2 6-3
Mmoh M.
Rubin N.
662
Mmoh M.
230

Noah Rubin defeated Michael Mmoh 6-2 6-3 in the Stockton CH semi-final on hard. Noah Rubin extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-07-01WimbledonQ1grassNoah Rubin6-3 6-4
2018-07-02WimbledonQ1grassMichael Mmoh7-6(6) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Rubin N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rubin N.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rubin N.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
91
Break points won·Even
31
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
90
Tiebreaks·Even
80
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rubin N.Mmoh M.
Freshness·
—
95

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tiafoe F.[3]
Rubin N.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[3]
Mcdonald M.
7-646-3
Rubin N.
Mmoh M.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.
King D.
6-46-4
Rubin N.
Dancevic F.
4-66-26-3
Mcdonald M.
Kudla D.[5]
3-67-616-4
Tiafoe F.[3]
Giannessi A.[6]
7-656-3
R16
Mcdonald M.
Smyczek T.[2]
6-46-4
Kudla D.[5]
Baker B.
5-76-47-5
Tiafoe F.[3]
Nevolo D.
7-666-3
Giannessi A.[6]
Nguyen D.
4-67-57-5
King D.
Arevalo M.
2-66-36-3
Mmoh M.
Caruso S.
6-36-2
Dancevic F.
Klein B.
6-46-4
Rubin N.
De Loore J.
7-53-66-1
R32
Klein B.
Halys Q.[8]
2-66-46-1
Smyczek T.[2]
Zemlja G.
6-43-66-1
Baker B.
Polansky P.
7-633-67-5
Kudla D.[5]
Meister N.
7-676-2
Tiafoe F.[3]
Rola B.
3-67-56-3
Nevolo D.
Nielsen F.
6-46-2
Mmoh M.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-1
King D.
Bangoura S.
6-06-3
Mcdonald M.
Verbeek S.
6-26-2
Nguyen D.
Bhambri Y.
2-66-46-3
Giannessi A.[6]
Chamba Gomez J.
6-16-4
Caruso S.
Novikov D.[7]
6-26-3
Arevalo M.
Giraldo S.[4]
6-32-66-4
Dancevic F.
Paul T.
6-26-2
Rubin N.
Clezar G.
2-66-36-3
De Loore J.
Fratangelo B.[1]
3-66-37-5