Kate Makarova vs Elena Vesnina — Beijing Round of 64
Beijing · WTA · Round of 64
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2016
hard
Makarova K.6-2 6-1
Vesnina E.
Makarova K.
662
Vesnina E.
210
Kate Makarova defeated Elena Vesnina 6-2 6-1 in the Beijing round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Kate Makarova came in leading the head-to-head 5–2. Kate Makarova extended the head-to-head to 6–2.
Key context
- Match story: Kate Makarova dropped just 3 games past Elena Vesnina.
Head to head
5–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-30 | St. Petersburg | R32 | hard | Elena Vesnina | 6-3 6-1 |
| 2016-06-27 | Wimbledon | R16 | grass | Elena Vesnina | 5-7 6-1 9-7 |
| 2015-05-25 | Roland Garros | R32 | clay | Kate Makarova | 6-2 6-4 |
| 2015-03-09 | Indian Wells | R64 | hard | Kate Makarova | 6-4 6-0 |
| 2014-08-04 | Montreal | R32 | hard | Kate Makarova | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2012-08-27 | US Open | R64 | hard | Kate Makarova | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2008-10-06 | Moscow | R32 | hard | Kate Makarova | 7-6(4) 7-6(1) |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Vesnina E.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
42%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
59%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.4
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 135). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
59
55
Break points saved·Even
78
77
Break points won·Slight edge
77
69
Deciding sets·Clear edge
60
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
29
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
26°CClear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 51%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Konta J.[11]
Zhang S.
6-46-0
Svitolina E.[16]
Saville D.
7-636-1
Keys M.[8]
Kvitova P.[14]
6-36-727-65
Radwanska A.[3]
Shvedova Y.
6-16-2
R16
Kvitova P.[14]
Muguruza G.[2]
6-16-4
Shvedova Y.
Cornet A.
6-26-4
Keys M.[8]
Kuznetsova S.[9]
7-626-2
Zhang S.
Halep S.[4]
6-06-3
Konta J.[11]
Pliskova K.[5]
6-13-67-62
Radwanska A.[3]
Wozniacki C.
6-36-1
Saville D.
Garcia C.
6-46-3
Svitolina E.[16]
Kerber A.[1]
6-37-5
R32
Wozniacki C.
Vinci R.[13]
6-36-2
Radwanska A.[3]
Makarova K.
6-36-4
Garcia C.
Peng S.
6-33-67-64
Saville D.
Bacsinszky T.[12]
4-66-06-4
Svitolina E.[16]
Lisicki S.
6-46-4
Kerber A.[1]
Strycova B.
6-37-64
Kuznetsova S.[9]
Doi M.
6-17-5
Konta J.[11]
Babos T.
7-56-2
Muguruza G.[2]
Putintseva Y.
6-27-65
Kvitova P.[14]
Wang Y.
6-46-1
Keys M.[8]
Mladenovic K.
7-56-4
Halep S.[4]
Wickmayer Y.
6-26-2
Zhang S.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-34-67-64
Pliskova K.[5]
Kasatkina D.
3-67-57-67
Shvedova Y.
Bencic B.
6-47-64
Cornet A.
Cibulkova D.[10]
6-25-76-2
R64
Garcia C.
Goerges J.
4-66-36-4
Saville D.
Mchale C.
6-46-4
Lisicki S.
Lucic M.
6-26-2
Vinci R.[13]
Zheng S.
6-03-66-3
Makarova K.
Vesnina E.
6-26-1
Muguruza G.[2]
Begu I.
2-66-26-3
Putintseva Y.
Ostapenko J.
6-13-67-5
Keys M.[8]
Duan Y.
6-04-66-1
Zhang S.
Stosur S.
6-16-2
Shvedova Y.
Suarez Navarro C.[7]
6-16-3
Wang Y.
Brengle M.
6-26-2
Doi M.
Gibbs N.
7-56-2
Konta J.[11]
Sevastova A.
6-16-1
Cornet A.
Rogers S.
4-66-26-2
Mladenovic K.
Jankovic J.
6-35-77-64
Riske Amritraj A.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[15]
7-646-1
Radwanska A.[3]
Wang Q.
6-26-2
Babos T.
Kovinic D.
6-16-2
Peng S.
Williams V.[6]
7-56-1
Kasatkina D.
Chirico L.
6-26-1
Pliskova K.[5]
Safarova L.
6-776-16-4
Wozniacki C.
Vandeweghe C.
6-12-66-4
Bacsinszky T.[12]
Arruabarrena L.
4-66-46-1
Kerber A.[1]
Siniakova K.
6-46-4
Svitolina E.[16]
Maria T.
6-26-2
Strycova B.
Siegemund L.
5-77-57-5
Wickmayer Y.
Puig M.
6-26-0
Bencic B.
Beck A.
6-36-2