Garbine Muguruza vs Irina Camelia Begu — Beijing Round of 64
Beijing · WTA · Round of 64
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 October 2016
hard
#173WTA
1769ELO
1686Hard ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLLW
Muguruza G.2-6 6-2 6-3
Begu I.
Muguruza G.
2662
Begu I.
6231
Garbine Muguruza defeated Irina Camelia Begu 2-6 6-2 6-3 in the Beijing round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Garbine Muguruza came in leading the head-to-head 2–1, defending the title. Garbine Muguruza extended the head-to-head to 3–1.
Key context
- Match story: Garbine Muguruza dropped the opening set before beating Irina Camelia Begu 2–6 6–2 6–3.
Head to head
2–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-07 | Dubai | R64 | hard | Garbine Muguruza | 6-3 7-5 |
| 2016-05-02 | Madrid | R32 | clay | Irina Camelia Begu | 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 |
| 2015-02-07 | Fed Cup WG R1: ROU vs ESP | RR | hard | Garbine Muguruza | 6-3 6-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Muguruza G.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (196 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
72
68
Break points saved·Dominant
90
58
Break points won·Even
88
88
Deciding sets·Clear edge
67
81
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
69
88
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
26°CClear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 51%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Konta J.[11]
Zhang S.
6-46-0
Svitolina E.[16]
Saville D.
7-636-1
Keys M.[8]
Kvitova P.[14]
6-36-727-65
Radwanska A.[3]
Shvedova Y.
6-16-2
R16
Kvitova P.[14]
Muguruza G.[2]
6-16-4
Shvedova Y.
Cornet A.
6-26-4
Keys M.[8]
Kuznetsova S.[9]
7-626-2
Zhang S.
Halep S.[4]
6-06-3
Konta J.[11]
Pliskova K.[5]
6-13-67-62
Radwanska A.[3]
Wozniacki C.
6-36-1
Saville D.
Garcia C.
6-46-3
Svitolina E.[16]
Kerber A.[1]
6-37-5
R32
Wozniacki C.
Vinci R.[13]
6-36-2
Radwanska A.[3]
Makarova K.
6-36-4
Garcia C.
Peng S.
6-33-67-64
Saville D.
Bacsinszky T.[12]
4-66-06-4
Svitolina E.[16]
Lisicki S.
6-46-4
Kerber A.[1]
Strycova B.
6-37-64
Kuznetsova S.[9]
Doi M.
6-17-5
Konta J.[11]
Babos T.
7-56-2
Muguruza G.[2]
Putintseva Y.
6-27-65
Kvitova P.[14]
Wang Y.
6-46-1
Keys M.[8]
Mladenovic K.
7-56-4
Halep S.[4]
Wickmayer Y.
6-26-2
Zhang S.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-34-67-64
Pliskova K.[5]
Kasatkina D.
3-67-57-67
Shvedova Y.
Bencic B.
6-47-64
Cornet A.
Cibulkova D.[10]
6-25-76-2
R64
Garcia C.
Goerges J.
4-66-36-4
Saville D.
Mchale C.
6-46-4
Lisicki S.
Lucic M.
6-26-2
Vinci R.[13]
Zheng S.
6-03-66-3
Makarova K.
Vesnina E.
6-26-1
Muguruza G.[2]
Begu I.
2-66-26-3
Putintseva Y.
Ostapenko J.
6-13-67-5
Keys M.[8]
Duan Y.
6-04-66-1
Zhang S.
Stosur S.
6-16-2
Shvedova Y.
Suarez Navarro C.[7]
6-16-3
Wang Y.
Brengle M.
6-26-2
Doi M.
Gibbs N.
7-56-2
Konta J.[11]
Sevastova A.
6-16-1
Cornet A.
Rogers S.
4-66-26-2
Mladenovic K.
Jankovic J.
6-35-77-64
Riske Amritraj A.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[15]
7-646-1
Radwanska A.[3]
Wang Q.
6-26-2
Babos T.
Kovinic D.
6-16-2
Peng S.
Williams V.[6]
7-56-1
Kasatkina D.
Chirico L.
6-26-1
Pliskova K.[5]
Safarova L.
6-776-16-4
Wozniacki C.
Vandeweghe C.
6-12-66-4
Bacsinszky T.[12]
Arruabarrena L.
4-66-46-1
Kerber A.[1]
Siniakova K.
6-46-4
Svitolina E.[16]
Maria T.
6-26-2
Strycova B.
Siegemund L.
5-77-57-5
Wickmayer Y.
Puig M.
6-26-0
Bencic B.
Beck A.
6-36-2