Frances Tiafoe vs John Patrick Smith — Tiburon CH Round of 16

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Frances Tiafoe
USA4
Frances Tiafoe
#17ATP
1918ELO
1861Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2016
hard
AUS
John Patrick Smith
37 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Tiafoe F.
6-3 6-3
Smith J.
Tiafoe F.
662
Smith J.
330

Frances Tiafoe defeated John Patrick Smith 6-3 6-3 in the Tiburon CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Frances Tiafoe came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tiafoe F.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Smith J.

Smith J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tiafoe F.Smith J.
38
Serve
—
37
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tiafoe F.Smith J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
69%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tiafoe F.Smith J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
83
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
86
Break points won·Dominant
57
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
98
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Tiafoe F.Smith J.
Freshness·
82
—

Tiafoe F.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
King D.
Mmoh M.
7-626-2
Semi-finals
Mmoh M.
Smyczek T.[3]
2-66-37-66
King D.
Mcdonald M.
4-67-57-5
Quarter-finals
Smyczek T.[3]
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Mcdonald M.
Tiafoe F.[4]
3-67-657-5
King D.
Novikov D.[5]
7-56-2
Mmoh M.
Fratangelo B.[2]
6-07-5
R16
King D.
Becker B.[1]
6-736-24-2
Fratangelo B.[2]
De Loore J.
6-27-5
Mmoh M.
Kozlov S.[6]
7-56-4
Smyczek T.[3]
Groth S.
7-57-611
Krueger M.
Halys Q.[8]
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Caruso S.
7-636-2
Tiafoe F.[4]
Smith J.
6-36-3
Novikov D.[5]
Baker B.
6-43-66-1
R32
Fratangelo B.[2]
Rubin N.
6-757-56-3
De Loore J.
Glasspool L.
6-27-68
Mmoh M.
Sandgren T.
4-67-652-0
Smyczek T.[3]
Klein B.
6-42-1
Kozlov S.[6]
Clezar G.
6-26-2
Groth S.
Nguyen D.
6-46-4
Smith J.
Arevalo M.
6-33-66-3
Krueger M.
Zemlja G.
6-16-4
Halys Q.[8]
Rola B.
5-77-656-1
Caruso S.
Escobedo E.[7]
6-32-66-3
Mcdonald M.
Polansky P.
6-36-4
Tiafoe F.[4]
Sarkissian A.
6-43-67-5
Novikov D.[5]
Bellamy R.
6-36-2
Baker B.
Krajicek A.
6-46-3
King D.
Bhambri Y.
6-23-66-3
Becker B.[1]
Paul T.
7-616-2