Andrey Rublev vs Lukas Lacko — Orleans CH Round of 32

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2016
hard
SVK5
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Rublev A.
6-7 6-4 6-3
Lacko L.
Rublev A.
69662
Lacko L.
711431

Andrey Rublev defeated Lukas Lacko 6-7 6-4 6-3 in the Orleans CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Lacko came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rublev A.Lacko L.
55
Serve
—
49
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
59%
Aces / match·Even
7.9
7.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
100
86
Break points won·Dominant
72
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Lacko L.
Freshness·
100
—

Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Herbert P.[7]
Gombos N.
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Gombos N.
Rublev A.
6-46-2
Herbert P.[7]
Brands D.
7-616-1
Quarter-finals
Herbert P.[7]
Bemelmans R.
7-637-610
Gombos N.
Brown D.[2]
6-26-0
Rublev A.
Chiudinelli M.
3-66-26-3
Brands D.
Medvedev D.
6-23-66-4
R16
Brown D.[2]
Pavic A.
6-26-4
Gombos N.
Nys H.
6-43-66-3
Chiudinelli M.
Mathieu P.[3]
6-16-4
Rublev A.
Kamke T.
6-31-66-0
Brands D.
Gojowczyk P.
5-76-47-62
Medvedev D.
Darcis S.
6-17-5
Herbert P.[7]
Robredo T.
4-67-656-4
Bemelmans R.
Millot V.
6-46-4
R32
Nys H.
Basic M.
3-65-2
Medvedev D.
Struff J.[4]
6-46-2
Brown D.[2]
Benneteau J.
7-646-4
Pavic A.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Albot R.[6]
7-616-2
Mathieu P.[3]
Mektic N.
7-51-66-2
Chiudinelli M.
Roger-Vasselin E.
6-16-4
Kamke T.
Melzer J.
6-16-1
Rublev A.
Lacko L.[5]
6-796-46-3
Brands D.
Istomin D.[8]
6-27-67
Gojowczyk P.
De Schepper K.
7-635-77-61
Darcis S.
Stakhovsky S.
7-636-1
Herbert P.[7]
Sidorenko A.
6-36-4
Robredo T.
Janowicz J.
3-66-37-5
Millot V.
Hoang A.
3-66-36-4
Bemelmans R.
Marchenko I.[1]
6-06-4