Jan Satral vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo — Rome CH Round of 16

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CZE
Jan Satral
35 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2016
clay
ESP7
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
48 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWWL
Satral J.
3-6 6-3 6-2
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Satral J.
3662
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6321

Jan Satral defeated Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo 3-6 6-3 6-2 in the Rome CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo came in defending last year's round of 32, but Jan Satral had been the form player, winning 5 of their last 9 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Satral J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ramirez Hidalgo R.

Ramirez Hidalgo R.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Satral J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Satral J.Ramirez Hidalgo R.
1st serve in·Even
57%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Satral J.Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Clutch Rating·Even
28
29
Break points saved·Even
67
63
Break points won·Even
28
30
Deciding sets·Even
25
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
55
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[2]
Krajinovic F.[5]
7-626-0
Satral J.
Haase R.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Krajinovic F.[5]
Vesely J.[1]
6-36-4
Edmund K.[2]
Volandri F.
6-16-4
Satral J.
Ymer M.
6-43-66-2
Haase R.[1]
Lamasine T.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[2]
Rola B.
6-43-66-0
Volandri F.
Trungelliti M.
6-46-1
Krajinovic F.[5]
Pellegrino A.
6-32-66-4
Vesely J.[1]
Kamke T.
7-56-0
Ymer M.
Fucsovics M.[8]
4-66-37-5
Satral J.
Bedene A.[3]
6-46-4
Lamasine T.
Ymer E.
2-66-26-3
Haase R.[1]
Martin A.[5]
6-16-3
R16
Edmund K.[2]
Krawietz K.
6-36-4
Rola B.
De Schepper K.[7]
6-16-0
Volandri F.
Copil M.
7-56-4
Krajinovic F.[5]
Nagal S.
5-76-36-2
Trungelliti M.
Paul T.
6-16-4
Pellegrino A.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-37-61
Kamke T.
Millot V.[8]
6-746-16-4
Vesely J.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-17-63
Lamasine T.
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
6-737-634-2
Ymer M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-41-67-66
Fucsovics M.[8]
Mager G.
6-06-3
Bedene A.[3]
Gaio F.
6-04-66-2
Satral J.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[7]
3-66-36-2
Ymer E.
Volandri F.
7-57-61
Martin A.[5]
Garin C.
6-47-63
Haase R.[1]
Pontoglio D.
6-26-2
R32
Paul T.
Fucsovics M.
6-05-76-4
Trungelliti M.
Thompson J.[6]
6-46-4
Edmund K.[2]
Zopp J.
6-46-3
Krawietz K.
Michon A.
2-66-46-1
De Schepper K.[7]
Naso G.
6-27-5
Copil M.
Pavlasek A.[4]
4-67-56-4
Volandri F.
Li Z.
6-26-0
Nagal S.
Moriya H.
5-76-36-1
Rola B.
Saville L.
6-26-1
Krajinovic F.[5]
Ungur A.
3-66-06-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Nedelko I.
6-46-0
Pellegrino A.
Zeballos H.[3]
6-44-66-4
Millot V.[8]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Bai Y.
6-26-2
Napolitano S.
Bonacia F.
3-67-56-2
Vesely J.[1]
Ilhan M.
7-56-2
Arnaboldi A.
Pavlasek A.[2]
7-636-4
Ymer M.
Janvier M.
6-46-2
Fucsovics M.[8]
Bourgue M.
6-36-3
Mager G.
Quinzi G.
6-37-5
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[7]
Michon A.
6-47-64
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
Diarra G.
7-676-4
Garin C.
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Pontoglio D.
Trinker B.
4-66-06-2
Haase R.[1]
Diez S.
4-66-36-3
Bedene A.[3]
Cecchinato M.
6-16-1
Gaio F.
Pellegrino A.
6-13-66-2
Satral J.
Giustino L.
6-06-4
Volandri F.
De Bakker T.[6]
6-26-3
Ymer E.
Ungur A.
2-66-36-4
Lamasine T.
Novak D.
6-36-4
Martin A.[5]
Djere L.
6-31-66-4