Norbert Gombos vs Andrey Rublev — Orleans CH Semi-final

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Norbert Gombos
SVK
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1452Hard ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2016
hard
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Gombos N.
6-4 6-2
Rublev A.
Gombos N.
662
Rublev A.
420

Norbert Gombos defeated Andrey Rublev 6-4 6-2 in the Orleans CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Andrey Rublev came in ranked #16, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Norbert Gombos claimed a first win over Andrey Rublev in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-10-26ViennaR32hardAndrey Rublev6-3 6-2
2015-04-20BarcelonaQ2clayAndrey Rublev7-6(4) 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Gombos N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gombos N.Rublev A.
—
Serve
55
—
Return
49

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gombos N.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
7.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gombos N.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
41
88
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
100
Break points won·Dominant
8
72
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
97
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gombos N.Rublev A.
Freshness·Clear edge
79
100

Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d) · Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Herbert P.[7]
Gombos N.
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Gombos N.
Rublev A.
6-46-2
Herbert P.[7]
Brands D.
7-616-1
Quarter-finals
Herbert P.[7]
Bemelmans R.
7-637-610
Gombos N.
Brown D.[2]
6-26-0
Rublev A.
Chiudinelli M.
3-66-26-3
Brands D.
Medvedev D.
6-23-66-4
R16
Brown D.[2]
Pavic A.
6-26-4
Gombos N.
Nys H.
6-43-66-3
Chiudinelli M.
Mathieu P.[3]
6-16-4
Rublev A.
Kamke T.
6-31-66-0
Brands D.
Gojowczyk P.
5-76-47-62
Medvedev D.
Darcis S.
6-17-5
Herbert P.[7]
Robredo T.
4-67-656-4
Bemelmans R.
Millot V.
6-46-4
R32
Nys H.
Basic M.
3-65-2
Medvedev D.
Struff J.[4]
6-46-2
Brown D.[2]
Benneteau J.
7-646-4
Pavic A.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Albot R.[6]
7-616-2
Mathieu P.[3]
Mektic N.
7-51-66-2
Chiudinelli M.
Roger-Vasselin E.
6-16-4
Kamke T.
Melzer J.
6-16-1
Rublev A.
Lacko L.[5]
6-796-46-3
Brands D.
Istomin D.[8]
6-27-67
Gojowczyk P.
De Schepper K.
7-635-77-61
Darcis S.
Stakhovsky S.
7-636-1
Herbert P.[7]
Sidorenko A.
6-36-4
Robredo T.
Janowicz J.
3-66-37-5
Millot V.
Hoang A.
3-66-36-4
Bemelmans R.
Marchenko I.[1]
6-06-4