Marton Fucsovics vs Gianluca Mager — Rome CH Round of 16

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Marton Fucsovics
HUN8
Marton Fucsovics
#78ATP
1756ELO
1686Clay ELO
$550kYTD
$8.7MCAREER
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2016
clay
ITA
Gianluca Mager
#1223ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Fucsovics M.
6-0 6-3
Mager G.
Fucsovics M.
662
Mager G.
030

Marton Fucsovics defeated Gianluca Mager 6-0 6-3 in the Rome CH round of 16 on clay. Marton Fucsovics claimed a first win over Gianluca Mager in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersR128hardGianluca Mager1-6 6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Fucsovics M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mager G.

Mager G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Fucsovics M.

Serve advantage — Fucsovics M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fucsovics M.Mager G.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
5.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fucsovics M.Mager G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
73
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
86
Break points won·Dominant
65
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
66
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
47
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fucsovics M.Mager G.
Freshness·
92
—

Fucsovics M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[2]
Krajinovic F.[5]
7-626-0
Satral J.
Haase R.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Krajinovic F.[5]
Vesely J.[1]
6-36-4
Edmund K.[2]
Volandri F.
6-16-4
Satral J.
Ymer M.
6-43-66-2
Haase R.[1]
Lamasine T.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[2]
Rola B.
6-43-66-0
Volandri F.
Trungelliti M.
6-46-1
Krajinovic F.[5]
Pellegrino A.
6-32-66-4
Vesely J.[1]
Kamke T.
7-56-0
Ymer M.
Fucsovics M.[8]
4-66-37-5
Satral J.
Bedene A.[3]
6-46-4
Lamasine T.
Ymer E.
2-66-26-3
Haase R.[1]
Martin A.[5]
6-16-3
R16
Edmund K.[2]
Krawietz K.
6-36-4
Rola B.
De Schepper K.[7]
6-16-0
Volandri F.
Copil M.
7-56-4
Krajinovic F.[5]
Nagal S.
5-76-36-2
Trungelliti M.
Paul T.
6-16-4
Pellegrino A.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-37-61
Kamke T.
Millot V.[8]
6-746-16-4
Vesely J.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-17-63
Lamasine T.
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
6-737-634-2
Ymer M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-41-67-66
Fucsovics M.[8]
Mager G.
6-06-3
Bedene A.[3]
Gaio F.
6-04-66-2
Satral J.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[7]
3-66-36-2
Ymer E.
Volandri F.
7-57-61
Martin A.[5]
Garin C.
6-47-63
Haase R.[1]
Pontoglio D.
6-26-2
R32
Paul T.
Fucsovics M.
6-05-76-4
Trungelliti M.
Thompson J.[6]
6-46-4
Edmund K.[2]
Zopp J.
6-46-3
Krawietz K.
Michon A.
2-66-46-1
De Schepper K.[7]
Naso G.
6-27-5
Copil M.
Pavlasek A.[4]
4-67-56-4
Volandri F.
Li Z.
6-26-0
Nagal S.
Moriya H.
5-76-36-1
Rola B.
Saville L.
6-26-1
Krajinovic F.[5]
Ungur A.
3-66-06-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Nedelko I.
6-46-0
Pellegrino A.
Zeballos H.[3]
6-44-66-4
Millot V.[8]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Bai Y.
6-26-2
Napolitano S.
Bonacia F.
3-67-56-2
Vesely J.[1]
Ilhan M.
7-56-2
Arnaboldi A.
Pavlasek A.[2]
7-636-4
Ymer M.
Janvier M.
6-46-2
Fucsovics M.[8]
Bourgue M.
6-36-3
Mager G.
Quinzi G.
6-37-5
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[7]
Michon A.
6-47-64
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
Diarra G.
7-676-4
Garin C.
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Pontoglio D.
Trinker B.
4-66-06-2
Haase R.[1]
Diez S.
4-66-36-3
Bedene A.[3]
Cecchinato M.
6-16-1
Gaio F.
Pellegrino A.
6-13-66-2
Satral J.
Giustino L.
6-06-4
Volandri F.
De Bakker T.[6]
6-26-3
Ymer E.
Ungur A.
2-66-36-4
Lamasine T.
Novak D.
6-36-4
Martin A.[5]
Djere L.
6-31-66-4