Steve Darcis vs Sergiy Stakhovsky — Orleans CH Round of 32

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BEL
Steve Darcis
42 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2016
hard
UKR
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
Darcis S.
7-6 6-1
Stakhovsky S.
Darcis S.
7762
Stakhovsky S.
6310

Steve Darcis defeated Sergiy Stakhovsky 7-6 6-1 in the Orleans CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sergiy Stakhovsky came in defending last year's quarter-final. Steve Darcis extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Steve Darcis came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-09-12Davis Cup WG PO: UKR vs BELRRhardSergiy Stakhovsky6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 6-2
2009-09-18Davis Cup WG PO: BEL vs UKRRRclaySteve Darcis6-2 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Darcis S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Stakhovsky S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Darcis S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Darcis S.Stakhovsky S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.9
7.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (159 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Darcis S.Stakhovsky S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
40
Break points saved·Even
87
88
Break points won·Dominant
52
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Herbert P.[7]
Gombos N.
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Gombos N.
Rublev A.
6-46-2
Herbert P.[7]
Brands D.
7-616-1
Quarter-finals
Herbert P.[7]
Bemelmans R.
7-637-610
Gombos N.
Brown D.[2]
6-26-0
Rublev A.
Chiudinelli M.
3-66-26-3
Brands D.
Medvedev D.
6-23-66-4
R16
Brown D.[2]
Pavic A.
6-26-4
Gombos N.
Nys H.
6-43-66-3
Chiudinelli M.
Mathieu P.[3]
6-16-4
Rublev A.
Kamke T.
6-31-66-0
Brands D.
Gojowczyk P.
5-76-47-62
Medvedev D.
Darcis S.
6-17-5
Herbert P.[7]
Robredo T.
4-67-656-4
Bemelmans R.
Millot V.
6-46-4
R32
Nys H.
Basic M.
3-65-2
Medvedev D.
Struff J.[4]
6-46-2
Brown D.[2]
Benneteau J.
7-646-4
Pavic A.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Albot R.[6]
7-616-2
Mathieu P.[3]
Mektic N.
7-51-66-2
Chiudinelli M.
Roger-Vasselin E.
6-16-4
Kamke T.
Melzer J.
6-16-1
Rublev A.
Lacko L.[5]
6-796-46-3
Brands D.
Istomin D.[8]
6-27-67
Gojowczyk P.
De Schepper K.
7-635-77-61
Darcis S.
Stakhovsky S.
7-636-1
Herbert P.[7]
Sidorenko A.
6-36-4
Robredo T.
Janowicz J.
3-66-37-5
Millot V.
Hoang A.
3-66-36-4
Bemelmans R.
Marchenko I.[1]
6-06-4