Daniil Medvedev vs Steve Darcis — Orleans CH Round of 16

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Daniil Medvedev
RUS
Daniil Medvedev
#8ATP
1977ELO
1962Hard ELO
$2.5MYTD
$52MCAREER
30 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2016
hard
BEL
Steve Darcis
42 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
Medvedev D.
6-1 7-5
Darcis S.
Medvedev D.
672
Darcis S.
150

Daniil Medvedev defeated Steve Darcis 6-1 7-5 in the Orleans CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniil Medvedev came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Medvedev D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Darcis S.

Darcis S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Medvedev D.

Serve advantage — Medvedev D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Medvedev D.Darcis S.
47
Serve
—
94
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Medvedev D.Darcis S.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Medvedev D.Darcis S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
96
69
Break points saved·Clear edge
100
87
Break points won·Dominant
99
52
Deciding sets·Clear edge
99
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Medvedev D.Darcis S.
Freshness·
90
—

Medvedev D.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Herbert P.[7]
Gombos N.
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Gombos N.
Rublev A.
6-46-2
Herbert P.[7]
Brands D.
7-616-1
Quarter-finals
Herbert P.[7]
Bemelmans R.
7-637-610
Gombos N.
Brown D.[2]
6-26-0
Rublev A.
Chiudinelli M.
3-66-26-3
Brands D.
Medvedev D.
6-23-66-4
R16
Brown D.[2]
Pavic A.
6-26-4
Gombos N.
Nys H.
6-43-66-3
Chiudinelli M.
Mathieu P.[3]
6-16-4
Rublev A.
Kamke T.
6-31-66-0
Brands D.
Gojowczyk P.
5-76-47-62
Medvedev D.
Darcis S.
6-17-5
Herbert P.[7]
Robredo T.
4-67-656-4
Bemelmans R.
Millot V.
6-46-4
R32
Nys H.
Basic M.
3-65-2
Medvedev D.
Struff J.[4]
6-46-2
Brown D.[2]
Benneteau J.
7-646-4
Pavic A.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Albot R.[6]
7-616-2
Mathieu P.[3]
Mektic N.
7-51-66-2
Chiudinelli M.
Roger-Vasselin E.
6-16-4
Kamke T.
Melzer J.
6-16-1
Rublev A.
Lacko L.[5]
6-796-46-3
Brands D.
Istomin D.[8]
6-27-67
Gojowczyk P.
De Schepper K.
7-635-77-61
Darcis S.
Stakhovsky S.
7-636-1
Herbert P.[7]
Sidorenko A.
6-36-4
Robredo T.
Janowicz J.
3-66-37-5
Millot V.
Hoang A.
3-66-36-4
Bemelmans R.
Marchenko I.[1]
6-06-4