Salvatore Caruso vs Ernesto Escobedo — Tiburon CH Round of 32

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2016
hard
MEX7
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
Caruso S.
6-3 2-6 6-3
Escobedo E.
Caruso S.
6262
Escobedo E.
3631

Salvatore Caruso defeated Ernesto Escobedo 6-3 2-6 6-3 in the Tiburon CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Salvatore Caruso came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Salvatore Caruso extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-09-27San DiegoQ1hardSalvatore Caruso7-5 1-6 6-4
2020-08-31US OpenR64hardSalvatore Caruso3-6 6-4 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Caruso S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Escobedo E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Serve advantage — Escobedo E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Caruso S.Escobedo E.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
5.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Caruso S.Escobedo E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
65
84
Break points won·Clear edge
30
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
King D.
Mmoh M.
7-626-2
Semi-finals
Mmoh M.
Smyczek T.[3]
2-66-37-66
King D.
Mcdonald M.
4-67-57-5
Quarter-finals
Smyczek T.[3]
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Mcdonald M.
Tiafoe F.[4]
3-67-657-5
King D.
Novikov D.[5]
7-56-2
Mmoh M.
Fratangelo B.[2]
6-07-5
R16
King D.
Becker B.[1]
6-736-24-2
Fratangelo B.[2]
De Loore J.
6-27-5
Mmoh M.
Kozlov S.[6]
7-56-4
Smyczek T.[3]
Groth S.
7-57-611
Krueger M.
Halys Q.[8]
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Caruso S.
7-636-2
Tiafoe F.[4]
Smith J.
6-36-3
Novikov D.[5]
Baker B.
6-43-66-1
R32
Fratangelo B.[2]
Rubin N.
6-757-56-3
De Loore J.
Glasspool L.
6-27-68
Mmoh M.
Sandgren T.
4-67-652-0
Smyczek T.[3]
Klein B.
6-42-1
Kozlov S.[6]
Clezar G.
6-26-2
Groth S.
Nguyen D.
6-46-4
Smith J.
Arevalo M.
6-33-66-3
Krueger M.
Zemlja G.
6-16-4
Halys Q.[8]
Rola B.
5-77-656-1
Caruso S.
Escobedo E.[7]
6-32-66-3
Mcdonald M.
Polansky P.
6-36-4
Tiafoe F.[4]
Sarkissian A.
6-43-67-5
Novikov D.[5]
Bellamy R.
6-36-2
Baker B.
Krajicek A.
6-46-3
King D.
Bhambri Y.
6-23-66-3
Becker B.[1]
Paul T.
7-616-2