Ruben Bemelmans vs Illya Marchenko — Orleans CH Round of 32

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BEL
Ruben Bemelmans
38 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 September 2016
hard
UKR1
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Bemelmans R.
6-0 6-4
Marchenko I.
Bemelmans R.
662
Marchenko I.
040

Ruben Bemelmans defeated Illya Marchenko 6-0 6-4 in the Orleans CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Illya Marchenko came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's semi-final. Ruben Bemelmans claimed a first win over Illya Marchenko in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-06-14Queen's ClubQ1grassIllya Marchenko6-3 1-6 6-2
2010-02-15MarseilleR32hardIllya Marchenko4-6 6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Bemelmans R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Marchenko I.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Bemelmans R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bemelmans R.Marchenko I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Even
5.5
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bemelmans R.Marchenko I.
Clutch Rating·Even
16
13
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
80
Break points won·Even
7
7
Deciding sets·Even
17
14
Tiebreaks·Even
9
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Herbert P.[7]
Gombos N.
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Gombos N.
Rublev A.
6-46-2
Herbert P.[7]
Brands D.
7-616-1
Quarter-finals
Herbert P.[7]
Bemelmans R.
7-637-610
Gombos N.
Brown D.[2]
6-26-0
Rublev A.
Chiudinelli M.
3-66-26-3
Brands D.
Medvedev D.
6-23-66-4
R16
Brown D.[2]
Pavic A.
6-26-4
Gombos N.
Nys H.
6-43-66-3
Chiudinelli M.
Mathieu P.[3]
6-16-4
Rublev A.
Kamke T.
6-31-66-0
Brands D.
Gojowczyk P.
5-76-47-62
Medvedev D.
Darcis S.
6-17-5
Herbert P.[7]
Robredo T.
4-67-656-4
Bemelmans R.
Millot V.
6-46-4
R32
Nys H.
Basic M.
3-65-2
Medvedev D.
Struff J.[4]
6-46-2
Brown D.[2]
Benneteau J.
7-646-4
Pavic A.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Albot R.[6]
7-616-2
Mathieu P.[3]
Mektic N.
7-51-66-2
Chiudinelli M.
Roger-Vasselin E.
6-16-4
Kamke T.
Melzer J.
6-16-1
Rublev A.
Lacko L.[5]
6-796-46-3
Brands D.
Istomin D.[8]
6-27-67
Gojowczyk P.
De Schepper K.
7-635-77-61
Darcis S.
Stakhovsky S.
7-636-1
Herbert P.[7]
Sidorenko A.
6-36-4
Robredo T.
Janowicz J.
3-66-37-5
Millot V.
Hoang A.
3-66-36-4
Bemelmans R.
Marchenko I.[1]
6-06-4