Skander Mansouri vs Strong Kirchheimer — Columbus CH Qualifying Round 1

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
TUN
Skander Mansouri
#1250ATP
30 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2016
hard
Strong Kirchheimer
USA
Strong Kirchheimer
#660ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWLL
Mansouri S.
7-6 7-6
Kirchheimer S.
Mansouri S.
78772
Kirchheimer S.
66650

Skander Mansouri defeated Strong Kirchheimer 7-6 7-6 in the Columbus CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mansouri S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kirchheimer S.

Kirchheimer S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mansouri S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mansouri S.Kirchheimer S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.8
4.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mansouri S.Kirchheimer S.
Clutch Rating·Even
2
6
Break points saved·Even
62
63
Break points won·Slight edge
8
0
Deciding sets·Even
6
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Mansouri S.Kirchheimer S.
Freshness·
—
78

Kirchheimer S.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Austin G.[7]
Crepaldi E.[4]
6-26-2
Libietis M.[3]
Bambridge L.[5]
6-46-1
Quiroz R.[2]
Bambridge L.[5]
6-46-4
Hiltzik J.
Rubin N.[1]
6-46-1
Callahan H.[8]
Austin G.[4]
7-656-4
Hiltzik A.[6]
Bambridge L.[3]
6-46-4
Aragone J.
Constantin Ignat D.
7-57-5
Kirchheimer S.
Gooch D.
6-12-66-4
Q2
Austin G.[7]
Tubert H.
6-36-2
Crepaldi E.[4]
Medinilla R.
6-16-2
Bambridge L.[5]
Di Feo H.
7-636-2
Libietis M.[3]
Seelig K.
3-66-36-1
Bambridge L.[5]
Gooch D.
6-43-66-4
Quiroz R.[2]
Mansouri S.
6-46-1
Hiltzik J.
Pollanen H.
6-46-4
Rubin N.[1]
Koepfer D.
6-766-16-3
Callahan H.[8]
Tubert H.
6-756-36-4
Austin G.[4]
Roelofse R.
4-67-656-3
Hiltzik A.[6]
Seelig K.
6-36-3
Bambridge L.[3]
Klahn B.
6-47-61
Constantin Ignat D.
Daciek P.[7]
6-47-64
Aragone J.
Soderlund C.[2]
6-26-776-4
Kirchheimer S.
Ghasya F.[5]
2-66-46-1
Gooch D.
King E.[1]
6-46-4
Q1
Austin G.[7]
Slobodchikov R.
6-46-3
Tubert H.
O'Hare D.
7-606-4
Medinilla R.
Kobelt A.
6-24-66-3
Crepaldi E.[4]
Yates T.
6-37-64
Bambridge L.[5]
Salisbury J.[8]
6-27-5
Di Feo H.
Yates T.
6-47-5
Seelig K.
Constantin Ignat D.
6-46-0
Bambridge L.[5]
Hach Verdugo H.
6-26-0
Gooch D.
Gadjiev A.
7-56-0
Mansouri S.
Kirchheimer S.
7-667-65
Hiltzik J.
Nevolo D.[6]
7-51-63-0
Pollanen H.
Uspensky D.
6-46-1
Koepfer D.
Hiltzik A.
3-67-616-2
Callahan H.[8]
Reist R.
6-16-2
Tubert H.
Obrien D.
6-26-746-2
Roelofse R.
Yates T.
6-46-727-65
Hiltzik A.[6]
Lawson A.
5-76-46-3
Seelig K.
Hach Verdugo H.
W/O
Klahn B.
Ho J.
6-26-2
Daciek P.[7]
Bushamuka W.
7-646-3
Aragone J.
Kobelt A.
6-26-3
Kirchheimer S.
Mendez M.
6-36-4
Gooch D.
Smith R.
6-16-2