Peter Polansky vs Emilio Gomez — Columbus CH Round of 32

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CAN4
Peter Polansky
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2016
hard
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Polansky P.
7-5 6-4
Gomez E.
Polansky P.
762
Gomez E.
540

Peter Polansky defeated Emilio Gomez 7-5 6-4 in the Columbus CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Peter Polansky came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Polansky P.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Polansky P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Polansky P.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Polansky P.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
18
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
77
Break points won·Slight edge
12
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
16
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
19
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Torpegaard M.
Becker B.[1]
6-41-66-2
Kozlov S.[4]
Sandgren T.[6]
6-12-66-2
Semi-finals
Torpegaard M.
Sandgren T.
7-57-65
Becker B.[1]
Smith J.
6-41-67-5
Sandgren T.[6]
Laaksonen H.[3]
6-25-76-4
Kozlov S.[4]
Barry S.[8]
7-57-66
Quarter-finals
Sandgren T.
Quiroz R.
6-07-63
Torpegaard M.
Austin G.
6-27-5
Smith J.
Bangoura S.
6-33-66-3
Becker B.[1]
Libietis M.
4-66-17-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Norrie C.
6-26-736-3
Laaksonen H.[3]
Kobelt P.
6-47-5
Kozlov S.[4]
King K.
6-27-5
Barry S.[8]
Fritz T.[1]
6-47-62
R16
Quiroz R.
King E.
6-46-4
Sandgren T.
Rola B.[7]
7-636-3
Torpegaard M.
Polansky P.[4]
6-46-726-4
Austin G.
Dancevic F.
7-646-3
Smith J.
Hurkacz H.
6-26-3
Libietis M.
Norrie C.
6-47-65
Becker B.[1]
Groth S.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.
Paul T.
6-36-3
Norrie C.
Bambridge L.
7-636-4
Sandgren T.[6]
Quigley E.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[3]
Mcnally J.
6-46-3
Kobelt P.
Krueger M.[5]
7-656-4
King K.
Harrison C.
6-36-3
Kozlov S.[4]
Koepfer D.
6-36-4
Barry S.[8]
Nevolo D.
6-46-2
Fritz T.[1]
Libietis M.
6-36-3
R32
Norrie C.
Escobedo E.[5]
7-641-0
King E.
Novikov D.[2]
6-46-757-62
Quiroz R.
Klein B.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.
Bester P.
6-46-4
Rola B.[7]
Scholtz N.
6-36-2
Polansky P.[4]
Gomez E.
7-56-4
Torpegaard M.
Meister N.
6-46-3
Austin G.
Joyce M.
6-46-2
Dancevic F.
Clezar G.[8]
6-26-4
Smith J.
Arevalo M.[6]
6-16-1
Hurkacz H.
Glasspool L.
6-47-5
Paul T.
Mcnally J.
6-36-3
Bangoura S.
Krajicek A.[3]
6-26-3
Libietis M.
Wolf J.
6-37-64
Groth S.
Hiltzik J.
6-37-66
Becker B.[1]
Quigley E.
7-56-4
Bambridge L.
Crepaldi E.
6-36-2
Norrie C.
Sarmiento R.
6-47-611
Quigley E.
Hiltzik A.
6-736-36-2
Sandgren T.[6]
Carter A.
6-26-2
Laaksonen H.[3]
Aragone J.
6-36-3
Mcnally J.
Pollanen H.
6-16-3
Kobelt P.
Vorster T.
6-47-5
Krueger M.[5]
Callahan H.
6-46-3
Harrison C.
Krajicek A.[7]
6-27-5
King K.
Joyce M.
7-656-2
Koepfer D.
Giron M.
7-636-4
Kozlov S.[4]
Statham J.
6-27-66
Barry S.[8]
Kirchheimer S.
7-56-4
Nevolo D.
Hiltzik J.
6-766-36-4
Libietis M.
Di Feo H.
5-76-27-63
Fritz T.[1]
Torpegaard M.
7-636-1