Tennys Sandgren vs Cameron Norrie — Cary CH Round of 16

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2016
hard
Cameron Norrie
GBR
Cameron Norrie
#38ATP
1829ELO
1789Hard ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Sandgren T.
7-6 6-3
Norrie C.
Sandgren T.
7762
Norrie C.
6430

Tennys Sandgren defeated Cameron Norrie 7-6 6-3 in the Cary CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's round of 32. Tennys Sandgren extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersR64hardCameron Norrie6-4 5-7 6-0
2019-01-07AucklandFhardTennys Sandgren6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Sandgren T.Norrie C.
—
Serve
45
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
5.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
90
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
99
Break points won·Dominant
2
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
98
Tiebreaks·Even
86
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sandgren T.Norrie C.
Freshness·
—
100

Norrie C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Mcgee J.
Escobedo E.[8]
1-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Escobedo E.[8]
Tiafoe F.[2]
6-36-757-62
Mcgee J.
Novikov D.[1]
3-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Sandgren T.
6-41-67-65
Mcgee J.
Schnur B.
6-26-4
Novikov D.[1]
Polansky P.[5]
6-32-66-4
Escobedo E.[8]
Kozlov S.[4]
3-66-16-2
R16
Kozlov S.[4]
Bester P.
6-46-1
Escobedo E.[8]
Shane R.
6-35-76-1
Schnur B.
Quigley E.
7-616-1
Novikov D.[1]
Klein B.
6-46-4
Tiafoe F.[2]
Mmoh M.
5-76-46-4
Sandgren T.
Norrie C.
7-646-3
Mcgee J.
King D.[6]
6-16-3
Polansky P.[5]
Gomez E.
6-06-3
R32
Kozlov S.[4]
Crepaldi E.
3-66-46-2
Shane R.
El Mihdawy A.
6-27-65
Mmoh M.
Paul T.
5-76-26-4
Bester P.
Meister N.
7-56-3
Escobedo E.[8]
Horton N.
6-26-2
King D.[6]
Scholtz N.
6-46-4
Mcgee J.
King E.
7-57-63
Quigley E.
Quiroz R.
7-56-3
Polansky P.[5]
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Gomez E.
Stachowiak N.
6-16-3
Klein B.
Bangoura S.
1-67-56-2
Novikov D.[1]
Libietis M.
7-666-4
Norrie C.
Arevalo M.[7]
6-46-3
Sandgren T.
Mcdonald M.
6-46-3
Tiafoe F.[2]
Haviland R.
3-66-37-62
Schnur B.
Krajicek A.[3]
7-647-5