Blaz Kavcic vs Amir Weintraub — Nanchang CH Round of 32

Nanchang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SLO
Blaz Kavcic
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2016
clay
ISR
Amir Weintraub
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Kavcic B.
6-4 6-3
Weintraub A.
Kavcic B.
662
Weintraub A.
430

Blaz Kavcic defeated Amir Weintraub 6-4 6-3 in the Nanchang CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Amir Weintraub came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's final. Blaz Kavcic claimed a first win over Amir Weintraub in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Blaz Kavcic closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-04-04Davis Cup G1 R2: SLO vs ISRRRclayAmir Weintraub4-6 7-5 6-3 3-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kavcic B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Weintraub A.

Weintraub A.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Kavcic B.

Serve advantage — Kavcic B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kavcic B.Weintraub A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
57%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.8
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 53). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kavcic B.Weintraub A.
Clutch Rating·Even
27
24
Break points saved·Even
43
45
Break points won·Slight edge
36
29
Deciding sets·Even
32
35
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Moriya H.
Chung H.[4]
4-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Chung H.[4]
Jung J.[6]
6-36-4
Moriya H.
Matosevic M.
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Moriya H.
Sarkissian A.
6-17-5
Matosevic M.
Zhang Z.[8]
7-644-66-4
Jung J.[6]
Thompson J.[2]
7-646-3
Chung H.[4]
Kavcic B.
4-66-36-4
R16
Chung H.[4]
Karatsev A.
6-36-3
Kavcic B.
Vanni L.[5]
7-56-2
Sarkissian A.
Kudryavtsev A.[7]
6-37-66
Moriya H.
Ito T.[3]
6-46-0
Zhang Z.[8]
Xia Z.
6-26-3
Matosevic M.
Lu Y.[1]
7-50-66-4
Jung J.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-37-63
Thompson J.[2]
Zhang Z.
6-16-4
R32
Zhang Z.
Mott B.
7-53-66-1
Jung J.[6]
He Y.
6-26-3
Chung H.[4]
Betov S.
6-06-2
Karatsev A.
Kibi Y.
6-37-64
Kavcic B.
Weintraub A.
6-46-3
Kudryavtsev A.[7]
Sun F.
3-66-36-4
Sarkissian A.
Zopp J.
6-36-1
Moriya H.
Pecotic M.
6-46-4
Ito T.[3]
Sekiguchi S.
6-31-67-66
Zhang Z.[8]
Wu D.
3-66-26-3
Xia Z.
Lee D.
1-67-56-3
Matosevic M.
Barrientos N.
6-46-4
Lu Y.[1]
Chen T.
3-66-46-3
Vanni L.[5]
Molchanov D.
6-00-1
Thompson J.[2]
Te R.
6-46-3
Uchiyama Y.
Li Z.
6-47-5