Jason Jung vs Jordan Thompson — Nanchang CH Quarter-final

Nanchang CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jason Jung
TPE6
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1359Clay ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2016
clay
Jordan Thompson
AUS2
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1605Clay ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
Jung J.
7-6 6-3
Thompson J.
Jung J.
7762
Thompson J.
6430

Jason Jung defeated Jordan Thompson 7-6 6-3 in the Nanchang CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jordan Thompson came in ranked #309, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Jung closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jung J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Thompson J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Serve advantage — Thompson J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jung J.Thompson J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.8
7.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jung J.Thompson J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
21
70
Break points saved·Dominant
64
97
Break points won·Clear edge
8
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
21
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jung J.Thompson J.
Freshness·
78
—

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Moriya H.
Chung H.[4]
4-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Chung H.[4]
Jung J.[6]
6-36-4
Moriya H.
Matosevic M.
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Moriya H.
Sarkissian A.
6-17-5
Matosevic M.
Zhang Z.[8]
7-644-66-4
Jung J.[6]
Thompson J.[2]
7-646-3
Chung H.[4]
Kavcic B.
4-66-36-4
R16
Chung H.[4]
Karatsev A.
6-36-3
Kavcic B.
Vanni L.[5]
7-56-2
Sarkissian A.
Kudryavtsev A.[7]
6-37-66
Moriya H.
Ito T.[3]
6-46-0
Zhang Z.[8]
Xia Z.
6-26-3
Matosevic M.
Lu Y.[1]
7-50-66-4
Jung J.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-37-63
Thompson J.[2]
Zhang Z.
6-16-4
R32
Zhang Z.
Mott B.
7-53-66-1
Jung J.[6]
He Y.
6-26-3
Chung H.[4]
Betov S.
6-06-2
Karatsev A.
Kibi Y.
6-37-64
Kavcic B.
Weintraub A.
6-46-3
Kudryavtsev A.[7]
Sun F.
3-66-36-4
Sarkissian A.
Zopp J.
6-36-1
Moriya H.
Pecotic M.
6-46-4
Ito T.[3]
Sekiguchi S.
6-31-67-66
Zhang Z.[8]
Wu D.
3-66-26-3
Xia Z.
Lee D.
1-67-56-3
Matosevic M.
Barrientos N.
6-46-4
Lu Y.[1]
Chen T.
3-66-46-3
Vanni L.[5]
Molchanov D.
6-00-1
Thompson J.[2]
Te R.
6-46-3
Uchiyama Y.
Li Z.
6-47-5