Andrey Rublev vs Christopher Oconnell — Seville CH Round of 32

Seville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2016
clay
AUS
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1569Clay ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Rublev A.
6-3 7-5
Oconnell C.
Rublev A.
672
Oconnell C.
350

Andrey Rublev defeated Christopher Oconnell 6-3 7-5 in the Seville CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Andrey Rublev came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Andrey Rublev extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrey Rublev closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-20Australian OpenR128hardAndrey Rublev6-3 0-6 6-4 7-6(5)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Oconnell C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Rublev A.Oconnell C.
13
Serve
—
64
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Oconnell C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
66%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.9
7.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Oconnell C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
49
Break points saved·Even
100
98
Break points won·Dominant
72
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
38
Tiebreaks·Even
92
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Oconnell C.
Freshness·
100
—

Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ruud C.
Daniel T.[3]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Daniel T.[3]
Majchrzak K.
6-26-1
Ruud C.
Cachin P.
4-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.
Melzer G.[2]
6-36-1
Daniel T.[3]
Rublev A.
4-66-36-2
Cachin P.
De Greef A.[6]
3-66-37-5
Ruud C.
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
3-66-16-4
R16
Rublev A.
Lopez Perez E.[8]
7-657-65
Melzer G.[2]
Jahn J.
6-06-4
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
Garin C.
6-746-47-61
Majchrzak K.
Michon A.
7-52-66-3
Daniel T.[3]
Bellotti R.
6-26-1
De Greef A.[6]
Taberner C.
6-43-66-3
Cachin P.
Roca Batalla O.
7-606-0
Ruud C.
Martin A.[5]
6-36-3
R32
Michon A.
Tepavac M.
6-32-66-2
Melzer G.[2]
Andujar P.
6-16-2
Majchrzak K.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[7]
6-04-0
Bellotti R.
De Paula F.
6-11-0
Roca Batalla O.
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
4-67-610-0
Daniel T.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-4
Lopez Perez E.[8]
Lipovsek Puches T.
3-67-626-0
Jahn J.
Toledo Bague P.
7-626-1
Ruud C.
Perez Sanz D.
4-67-616-4
Garin C.
Giustino L.
6-46-4
Rublev A.
Oconnell C.
6-37-5
De Greef A.[6]
Santillan A.
7-627-5
Taberner C.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-1
Cachin P.
Martinez P.
6-27-69
Martin A.[5]
Mertl J.
7-56-3
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
Malla B.
6-33-66-3