Jason Jung vs Go Soeda — Shanghai CH Quarter-final

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jason Jung
TPE6
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2016
hard
JPN3
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Jung J.
6-2 7-5
Soeda G.
Jung J.
672
Soeda G.
250

Jason Jung defeated Go Soeda 6-2 7-5 in the Shanghai CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Go Soeda came in defending last year's round of 16. Jason Jung extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Jung closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-02-07DallasQ1hardJason Jung3-6 6-1 7-6(6)
2021-08-02WashingtonQ1hardGo Soeda6-4 6-7(2) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Jung J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Soeda G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jung J.Soeda G.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jung J.Soeda G.
Clutch Rating·Even
21
23
Break points saved·Even
64
61
Break points won·Slight edge
8
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
21
46
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jung J.Soeda G.
Freshness·
78
—

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Laaksonen H.[4]
Jung J.[6]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Laaksonen H.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-37-5
Jung J.[6]
Thompson J.[1]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[1]
Kwon S.
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.[4]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-2
Jung J.[6]
Soeda G.[3]
6-27-5
Uchiyama Y.
Kavcic B.
7-56-3
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Weintraub A.
6-27-5
Laaksonen H.[4]
Li Z.
6-16-4
Kavcic B.
Kudryavtsev A.[7]
6-37-5
Sarkissian A.
Gao X.
6-06-1
Jung J.[6]
Kibi Y.
6-746-46-3
Soeda G.[3]
Karatsev A.
7-56-4
Kwon S.
Pecotic M.
7-56-4
Thompson J.[1]
Matosevic M.
6-37-66
R32
Kwon S.
Barrientos N.
6-16-3
Weintraub A.
Ito T.[2]
4-66-16-0
Uchiyama Y.
Gombos N.
6-766-36-4
Kavcic B.
Sekiguchi S.
7-56-3
Kudryavtsev A.[7]
Zopp J.
6-36-0
Laaksonen H.[4]
Xia Z.
6-46-4
Li Z.
Wu D.
6-46-2
Sarkissian A.
Sun F.
6-06-3
Gao X.
Vanni L.[5]
4-66-36-4
Jung J.[6]
Molchanov D.
6-26-3
Kibi Y.
Qiu Z.
6-06-2
Karatsev A.
Moriya H.
6-26-4
Soeda G.[3]
Mott B.
3-66-16-4
Pecotic M.
Zhang Z.[8]
6-33-67-68
Matosevic M.
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Chen T.
6-26-727-64