Henri Laaksonen vs Jason Jung — Shanghai CH Final

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Final
SUI4
Henri Laaksonen
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2016
hard
Jason Jung
TPE6
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Laaksonen H.
6-3 6-3
Jung J.
Laaksonen H.
662
Jung J.
330

Henri Laaksonen defeated Jason Jung 6-3 6-3 in the Shanghai CH final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jason Jung came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Henri Laaksonen claimed a first win over Jason Jung in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-02WimbledonQ2grassJason Jung7-6(7) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Laaksonen H.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Laaksonen H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Laaksonen H.Jung J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Laaksonen H.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
64
Break points won·Clear edge
20
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
25
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Laaksonen H.Jung J.
Freshness·
—
78

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Laaksonen H.[4]
Jung J.[6]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Laaksonen H.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-37-5
Jung J.[6]
Thompson J.[1]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[1]
Kwon S.
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.[4]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-2
Jung J.[6]
Soeda G.[3]
6-27-5
Uchiyama Y.
Kavcic B.
7-56-3
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Weintraub A.
6-27-5
Laaksonen H.[4]
Li Z.
6-16-4
Kavcic B.
Kudryavtsev A.[7]
6-37-5
Sarkissian A.
Gao X.
6-06-1
Jung J.[6]
Kibi Y.
6-746-46-3
Soeda G.[3]
Karatsev A.
7-56-4
Kwon S.
Pecotic M.
7-56-4
Thompson J.[1]
Matosevic M.
6-37-66
R32
Kwon S.
Barrientos N.
6-16-3
Weintraub A.
Ito T.[2]
4-66-16-0
Uchiyama Y.
Gombos N.
6-766-36-4
Kavcic B.
Sekiguchi S.
7-56-3
Kudryavtsev A.[7]
Zopp J.
6-36-0
Laaksonen H.[4]
Xia Z.
6-46-4
Li Z.
Wu D.
6-46-2
Sarkissian A.
Sun F.
6-06-3
Gao X.
Vanni L.[5]
4-66-36-4
Jung J.[6]
Molchanov D.
6-26-3
Kibi Y.
Qiu Z.
6-06-2
Karatsev A.
Moriya H.
6-26-4
Soeda G.[3]
Mott B.
3-66-16-4
Pecotic M.
Zhang Z.[8]
6-33-67-68
Matosevic M.
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Chen T.
6-26-727-64