Amir Weintraub vs Tatsuma Ito — Shanghai CH Round of 32

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ISR
Amir Weintraub
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2016
hard
JPN2
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Weintraub A.
4-6 6-1 6-0
Ito T.
Weintraub A.
4662
Ito T.
6101

Amir Weintraub defeated Tatsuma Ito 4-6 6-1 6-0 in the Shanghai CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Amir Weintraub came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. Amir Weintraub extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-09-14Davis Cup WG PO: JPN vs ISRRRhardAmir Weintraub6-3 6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Weintraub A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Ito T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Weintraub A.

Serve advantage — Ito T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Weintraub A.Ito T.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.6
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (53 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Weintraub A.Ito T.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
45
61
Break points won·Clear edge
29
9
Deciding sets·Slight edge
35
43
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
60
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Laaksonen H.[4]
Jung J.[6]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Laaksonen H.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-37-5
Jung J.[6]
Thompson J.[1]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[1]
Kwon S.
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.[4]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-2
Jung J.[6]
Soeda G.[3]
6-27-5
Uchiyama Y.
Kavcic B.
7-56-3
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Weintraub A.
6-27-5
Laaksonen H.[4]
Li Z.
6-16-4
Kavcic B.
Kudryavtsev A.[7]
6-37-5
Sarkissian A.
Gao X.
6-06-1
Jung J.[6]
Kibi Y.
6-746-46-3
Soeda G.[3]
Karatsev A.
7-56-4
Kwon S.
Pecotic M.
7-56-4
Thompson J.[1]
Matosevic M.
6-37-66
R32
Kwon S.
Barrientos N.
6-16-3
Weintraub A.
Ito T.[2]
4-66-16-0
Uchiyama Y.
Gombos N.
6-766-36-4
Kavcic B.
Sekiguchi S.
7-56-3
Kudryavtsev A.[7]
Zopp J.
6-36-0
Laaksonen H.[4]
Xia Z.
6-46-4
Li Z.
Wu D.
6-46-2
Sarkissian A.
Sun F.
6-06-3
Gao X.
Vanni L.[5]
4-66-36-4
Jung J.[6]
Molchanov D.
6-26-3
Kibi Y.
Qiu Z.
6-06-2
Karatsev A.
Moriya H.
6-26-4
Soeda G.[3]
Mott B.
3-66-16-4
Pecotic M.
Zhang Z.[8]
6-33-67-68
Matosevic M.
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Chen T.
6-26-727-64