Casper Ruud vs Taro Daniel — Seville CH Final

Seville CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Casper Ruud
NOR
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2016
clay
Taro Daniel
JPN3
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1542Clay ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
Ruud C.
6-3 6-4
Daniel T.
Ruud C.
662
Daniel T.
340

Casper Ruud defeated Taro Daniel 6-3 6-4 in the Seville CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13. Casper Ruud extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Casper Ruud closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-29Paris OlympicsR64clayCasper Ruud7-5 6-1
2023-02-27AcapulcoR16hardTaro Daniel7-5 2-6 7-6(5)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve advantage — Ruud C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ruud C.Daniel T.
58
Serve
—
70
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
93
Break points won·Dominant
75
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
18
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Daniel T.
Freshness·Dominant
100
59

Ruud C.: 15 days rest · Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ruud C.
Daniel T.[3]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Daniel T.[3]
Majchrzak K.
6-26-1
Ruud C.
Cachin P.
4-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.
Melzer G.[2]
6-36-1
Daniel T.[3]
Rublev A.
4-66-36-2
Cachin P.
De Greef A.[6]
3-66-37-5
Ruud C.
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
3-66-16-4
R16
Rublev A.
Lopez Perez E.[8]
7-657-65
Melzer G.[2]
Jahn J.
6-06-4
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
Garin C.
6-746-47-61
Majchrzak K.
Michon A.
7-52-66-3
Daniel T.[3]
Bellotti R.
6-26-1
De Greef A.[6]
Taberner C.
6-43-66-3
Cachin P.
Roca Batalla O.
7-606-0
Ruud C.
Martin A.[5]
6-36-3
R32
Michon A.
Tepavac M.
6-32-66-2
Melzer G.[2]
Andujar P.
6-16-2
Majchrzak K.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[7]
6-04-0
Bellotti R.
De Paula F.
6-11-0
Roca Batalla O.
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
4-67-610-0
Daniel T.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-4
Lopez Perez E.[8]
Lipovsek Puches T.
3-67-626-0
Jahn J.
Toledo Bague P.
7-626-1
Ruud C.
Perez Sanz D.
4-67-616-4
Garin C.
Giustino L.
6-46-4
Rublev A.
Oconnell C.
6-37-5
De Greef A.[6]
Santillan A.
7-627-5
Taberner C.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-1
Cachin P.
Martinez P.
6-27-69
Martin A.[5]
Mertl J.
7-56-3
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
Malla B.
6-33-66-3