Taro Daniel vs Kamil Majchrzak — Seville CH Semi-final

Seville CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Taro Daniel
JPN3
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1542Clay ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2016
clay
Kamil Majchrzak
POL
Kamil Majchrzak
#66ATP
1801ELO
1723Clay ELO
$617kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
Daniel T.
6-2 6-1
Majchrzak K.
Daniel T.
662
Majchrzak K.
210

Taro Daniel defeated Kamil Majchrzak 6-2 6-1 in the Seville CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Kamil Majchrzak came in ranked #66, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Majchrzak K.

Majchrzak K.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Serve advantage — Majchrzak K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Majchrzak K.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Majchrzak K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
68
Break points saved·Even
93
97
Break points won·Clear edge
37
51
Deciding sets·Dominant
18
73
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
81
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Majchrzak K.
Freshness·Dominant
59
92

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d) · Majchrzak K.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ruud C.
Daniel T.[3]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Daniel T.[3]
Majchrzak K.
6-26-1
Ruud C.
Cachin P.
4-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.
Melzer G.[2]
6-36-1
Daniel T.[3]
Rublev A.
4-66-36-2
Cachin P.
De Greef A.[6]
3-66-37-5
Ruud C.
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
3-66-16-4
R16
Rublev A.
Lopez Perez E.[8]
7-657-65
Melzer G.[2]
Jahn J.
6-06-4
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
Garin C.
6-746-47-61
Majchrzak K.
Michon A.
7-52-66-3
Daniel T.[3]
Bellotti R.
6-26-1
De Greef A.[6]
Taberner C.
6-43-66-3
Cachin P.
Roca Batalla O.
7-606-0
Ruud C.
Martin A.[5]
6-36-3
R32
Michon A.
Tepavac M.
6-32-66-2
Melzer G.[2]
Andujar P.
6-16-2
Majchrzak K.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[7]
6-04-0
Bellotti R.
De Paula F.
6-11-0
Roca Batalla O.
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
4-67-610-0
Daniel T.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-4
Lopez Perez E.[8]
Lipovsek Puches T.
3-67-626-0
Jahn J.
Toledo Bague P.
7-626-1
Ruud C.
Perez Sanz D.
4-67-616-4
Garin C.
Giustino L.
6-46-4
Rublev A.
Oconnell C.
6-37-5
De Greef A.[6]
Santillan A.
7-627-5
Taberner C.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-1
Cachin P.
Martinez P.
6-27-69
Martin A.[5]
Mertl J.
7-56-3
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
Malla B.
6-33-66-3