Casper Ruud vs Pedro Cachin — Seville CH Semi-final

Seville CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Casper Ruud
NOR
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2016
clay
ARG
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
Ruud C.
4-6 6-3 6-2
Cachin P.
Ruud C.
4662
Cachin P.
6321

Casper Ruud defeated Pedro Cachin 4-6 6-3 6-2 in the Seville CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Cachin P.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ruud C.Cachin P.
58
Serve
—
70
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Cachin P.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Cachin P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
22
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
77
Break points won·Dominant
75
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Cachin P.
Freshness·
100
—

Ruud C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ruud C.
Daniel T.[3]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Daniel T.[3]
Majchrzak K.
6-26-1
Ruud C.
Cachin P.
4-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.
Melzer G.[2]
6-36-1
Daniel T.[3]
Rublev A.
4-66-36-2
Cachin P.
De Greef A.[6]
3-66-37-5
Ruud C.
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
3-66-16-4
R16
Rublev A.
Lopez Perez E.[8]
7-657-65
Melzer G.[2]
Jahn J.
6-06-4
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
Garin C.
6-746-47-61
Majchrzak K.
Michon A.
7-52-66-3
Daniel T.[3]
Bellotti R.
6-26-1
De Greef A.[6]
Taberner C.
6-43-66-3
Cachin P.
Roca Batalla O.
7-606-0
Ruud C.
Martin A.[5]
6-36-3
R32
Michon A.
Tepavac M.
6-32-66-2
Melzer G.[2]
Andujar P.
6-16-2
Majchrzak K.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[7]
6-04-0
Bellotti R.
De Paula F.
6-11-0
Roca Batalla O.
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
4-67-610-0
Daniel T.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-4
Lopez Perez E.[8]
Lipovsek Puches T.
3-67-626-0
Jahn J.
Toledo Bague P.
7-626-1
Ruud C.
Perez Sanz D.
4-67-616-4
Garin C.
Giustino L.
6-46-4
Rublev A.
Oconnell C.
6-37-5
De Greef A.[6]
Santillan A.
7-627-5
Taberner C.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-1
Cachin P.
Martinez P.
6-27-69
Martin A.[5]
Mertl J.
7-56-3
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
Malla B.
6-33-66-3