Jordi Samper Montana vs Daniel Cox — Meerbusch CH Round of 32

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP6
Jordi Samper Montana
36 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 August 2016
clay
GBR
Daniel Cox
35 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLWLW
Samper Montana J.
6-1 6-4
Cox D.
Samper Montana J.
662
Cox D.
140

Jordi Samper Montana defeated Daniel Cox 6-1 6-4 in the Meerbusch CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jordi Samper Montana came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Samper Montana J.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Cox D.

Cox D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Samper Montana J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Samper Montana J.Cox D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
54%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.9
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 59). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Samper Montana J.Cox D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
18
30
Break points saved·Dominant
20
52
Break points won·Clear edge
41
27
Deciding sets·Clear edge
50
67
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
26
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mayer F.[1]
Marterer M.
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Marterer M.
Geens C.
6-06-4
Mayer F.[1]
Masur D.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Marterer M.
Carballes Baena R.[2]
3-66-36-1
Geens C.
Janowicz J.[5]
6-36-756-3
Masur D.
Metreveli A.
7-643-67-5
Mayer F.[1]
Sieber M.
6-47-5
R16
Marterer M.
Mertens Y.
6-26-4
Geens C.
Diez S.[4]
7-646-4
Janowicz J.[5]
Gigounon G.
6-13-66-3
Metreveli A.
Santillan A.
2-66-46-0
Masur D.
Vasilevski A.
6-26-1
Sieber M.
Samper Montana J.[6]
4-66-17-62
Mayer F.[1]
Kuhn N.
6-26-3
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Jahn J.
6-733-3
R32
Metreveli A.
Gombos N.
6-12-67-64
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Elgin M.
6-06-3
Jahn J.
Ortega Olmedo R.
5-76-36-3
Marterer M.
Ghem A.[7]
3-66-36-2
Diez S.[4]
Greven M.
6-16-2
Geens C.
Jankovits Y.
6-46-2
Gigounon G.
Langer N.
6-45-76-3
Janowicz J.[5]
Horansky F.
6-16-2
Santillan A.
Ignatik U.[8]
4-67-646-3
Masur D.
Otte O.
6-36-0
Samper Montana J.[6]
Cox D.
6-16-4
Sieber M.
Matic N.
6-06-0
Mayer F.[1]
Prudnikau A.
6-06-3
Vasilevski A.
Sijsling I.[3]
0-0
Mertens Y.
Vatutin A.
1-67-656-3
Kuhn N.
Paz J.
6-42-66-2