Andre Ghem vs Inigo Cervantes Huegun — Trnava CH Round of 32

Trnava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BRA
Andre Ghem
44 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 August 2016
clay
ESP1
Inigo Cervantes Huegun
36 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
Ghem A.
6-4 7-5
Cervantes Huegun I.
Ghem A.
672
Cervantes Huegun I.
450

Andre Ghem defeated Inigo Cervantes Huegun 6-4 7-5 in the Trnava CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Inigo Cervantes Huegun came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. Andre Ghem claimed a first win over Inigo Cervantes Huegun in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-07-07BastadQ3clayInigo Cervantes Huegun6-3 3-6 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Ghem A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Cervantes Huegun I.

Cervantes Huegun I.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ghem A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ghem A.Cervantes Huegun I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
51%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 173). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ghem A.Cervantes Huegun I.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
8
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
56
71
Break points won·Even
17
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
10
15
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
24
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Darcis S.[5]
Samper Montana J.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Samper Montana J.
Santillan A.
7-56-756-4
Darcis S.[5]
Diez S.[8]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Diez S.[8]
Michalicka M.
6-36-4
Samper Montana J.
Coppejans K.[6]
6-07-66
Darcis S.[5]
Sijsling I.[3]
6-16-4
Santillan A.
Hurkacz H.
7-57-5
R16
Michalicka M.
Jebavy R.
5-76-26-2
Diez S.[8]
Gombos N.
7-643-67-65
Darcis S.[5]
Stanek R.
6-46-1
Santillan A.
Lestienne C.[7]
6-26-0
Hurkacz H.
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
3-66-47-65
Coppejans K.[6]
Satral J.
6-16-1
Samper Montana J.
Ghem A.
6-46-3
Sijsling I.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-4
R32
Lestienne C.[7]
Vatutin A.
2-66-46-2
Sijsling I.[3]
Djere L.
4-66-27-5
Michalicka M.
Pavlasek A.[2]
2-66-36-2
Jebavy R.
Sproch D.
6-36-1
Gombos N.
Sakharov G.
6-26-2
Diez S.[8]
Geens C.
6-37-5
Blancaneaux G.
Fabian P.
6-46-3
Stanek R.
Blasko M.
6-36-2
Darcis S.[5]
De Paula F.
6-16-4
Santillan A.
De Loore J.
4-67-667-65
Hurkacz H.
Melzer J.
4-66-16-2
Gimeno Traver D.[4]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Coppejans K.[6]
Bellotti R.
6-06-2
Satral J.
Eriksson M.
1-66-36-3
Samper Montana J.
Reuter Y.
6-34-66-3
Ghem A.
Cervantes Huegun I.[1]
6-47-5