Inigo Cervantes Huegun vs Tim Van Rijthoven — Scheveningen CH Round of 32

Scheveningen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP2
Inigo Cervantes Huegun
36 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 July 2016
clay
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Cervantes Huegun I.
2-6 6-3 6-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Cervantes Huegun I.
2662
Van Rijthoven T.
6341

Inigo Cervantes Huegun defeated Tim Van Rijthoven 2-6 6-3 6-4 in the Scheveningen CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Inigo Cervantes Huegun came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cervantes Huegun I.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Van Rijthoven T.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Cervantes Huegun I.

Serve advantage — Van Rijthoven T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cervantes Huegun I.Van Rijthoven T.
1st serve in·Clear edge
51%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
76%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
68%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
9.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (173 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cervantes Huegun I.Van Rijthoven T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
13
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
71
90
Break points won·Clear edge
19
1
Deciding sets·Even
15
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
9
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Haase R.[4]
Pavlasek A.[7]
6-46-796-2
Semi-finals
Pavlasek A.[7]
Reuter Y.
7-666-4
Haase R.[4]
Lestienne C.[9]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Reuter Y.
Sousa P.
2-66-46-4
Pavlasek A.[7]
Griekspoor T.
4-67-56-3
Haase R.[4]
Vatutin A.
6-16-1
Lestienne C.[9]
Westerhof B.
6-46-3
R16
Reuter Y.
Cervantes Huegun I.[2]
7-647-64
Griekspoor T.
Bagnis F.[3]
7-646-4
Sousa P.
Sakharov G.
2-66-46-4
Pavlasek A.[7]
Torebko P.
6-36-2
Vatutin A.
Majchrzak K.
5-77-656-1
Haase R.[4]
Tsitsipas S.
6-41-66-1
Westerhof B.
Krstin P.
6-36-4
Lestienne C.[9]
Huta Galung J.
6-26-1
R32
Tsitsipas S.
Diarra G.
7-647-62
Pavlasek A.[7]
Galarza J.
6-33-66-3
Cervantes Huegun I.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
2-66-36-4
Reuter Y.
Hoang A.
7-637-5
Sousa P.
Smirnov A.
6-26-1
Sakharov G.
Sijsling I.[6]
2-66-16-4
Bagnis F.[3]
Van Der Duim A.
6-26-3
Griekspoor T.
Lapentti G.
3-66-26-2
Torebko P.
Von Massow G.
2-66-27-5
Vatutin A.
Olivo R.[5]
7-52-66-0
Majchrzak K.
Griekspoor S.
6-27-5
Haase R.[4]
Riba P.
7-56-4
Krstin P.
Munoz de la Nava D.[8]
7-56-3
Westerhof B.
Trinker B.
5-76-36-1
Huta Galung J.
Velotti A.
6-36-4
Lestienne C.[9]
Stanek R.
3-66-46-0