Daniel Nguyen vs Michael Mmoh — Binghamton CH Round of 32

Binghamton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2016
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Nguyen D.
6-2 6-1
Mmoh M.
Nguyen D.
662
Mmoh M.
210

Daniel Nguyen defeated Michael Mmoh 6-2 6-1 in the Binghamton CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Daniel Nguyen came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nguyen D.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nguyen D.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.0
6.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.3
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (103 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nguyen D.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
21
66
Break points saved·Dominant
37
91
Break points won·Slight edge
22
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nguyen D.Mmoh M.
Freshness·
—
95

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
King D.[6]
Krueger M.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
King D.[6]
Golubev A.[9]
1-66-16-3
Krueger M.
Ramanathan R.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Golubev A.[9]
Glasspool L.
6-42-66-4
King D.[6]
Kozlov S.[3]
6-24-1
Krueger M.
Moriya H.
6-37-66
Ramanathan R.
Klein B.
7-656-736-2
R16
King D.[6]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.
Statham J.
2-66-47-63
Golubev A.[9]
Crepaldi E.
6-26-1
Glasspool L.
Meister N.
6-37-67
Kozlov S.[3]
Nguyen D.
7-676-4
Moriya H.
Bangoura S.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Smith J.[4]
7-57-65
Klein B.
Vukic A.
6-746-36-1
R32
Statham J.
Clezar G.[7]
6-727-56-4
Ramanathan R.
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Vukic A.
Gomez E.
6-36-4
Klein B.
Halys Q.[1]
6-36-756-3
Smith J.[4]
Broady L.
6-746-47-5
Golubev A.[9]
King E.
7-652-66-2
Crepaldi E.
Barry S.
7-654-67-63
Meister N.
Mitchell B.
6-37-63
Glasspool L.
Rubin N.[5]
6-36-2
Kozlov S.[3]
Nevolo D.
3-67-56-0
Nguyen D.
Mmoh M.
6-26-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Reid M.
6-46-3
King D.[6]
Tearney F.
6-43-66-0
Bangoura S.
Paul T.[8]
4-66-16-1
Moriya H.
Kobelt P.
6-04-1
Krueger M.
Hiltzik J.
6-36-3