Mitchell Krueger vs Hiroki Moriya — Binghamton CH Quarter-final

Binghamton CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2016
hard
Hiroki Moriya
JPN
Hiroki Moriya
#507ATP
1353ELO
1321Hard ELO
35 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLL
Krueger M.
6-3 7-6
Moriya H.
Krueger M.
6782
Moriya H.
3660

Mitchell Krueger defeated Hiroki Moriya 6-3 7-6 in the Binghamton CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Mitchell Krueger came in ranked #364, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Moriya H.

Moriya H.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Moriya H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
1.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Moriya H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
16
1
Break points saved·Dominant
87
35
Break points won·Slight edge
14
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
13
29
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
0
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Moriya H.
Freshness·Dominant
87
56

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d) · Moriya H.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 84 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
King D.[6]
Krueger M.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
King D.[6]
Golubev A.[9]
1-66-16-3
Krueger M.
Ramanathan R.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Golubev A.[9]
Glasspool L.
6-42-66-4
King D.[6]
Kozlov S.[3]
6-24-1
Krueger M.
Moriya H.
6-37-66
Ramanathan R.
Klein B.
7-656-736-2
R16
King D.[6]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.
Statham J.
2-66-47-63
Golubev A.[9]
Crepaldi E.
6-26-1
Glasspool L.
Meister N.
6-37-67
Kozlov S.[3]
Nguyen D.
7-676-4
Moriya H.
Bangoura S.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Smith J.[4]
7-57-65
Klein B.
Vukic A.
6-746-36-1
R32
Statham J.
Clezar G.[7]
6-727-56-4
Ramanathan R.
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Vukic A.
Gomez E.
6-36-4
Klein B.
Halys Q.[1]
6-36-756-3
Smith J.[4]
Broady L.
6-746-47-5
Golubev A.[9]
King E.
7-652-66-2
Crepaldi E.
Barry S.
7-654-67-63
Meister N.
Mitchell B.
6-37-63
Glasspool L.
Rubin N.[5]
6-36-2
Kozlov S.[3]
Nevolo D.
3-67-56-0
Nguyen D.
Mmoh M.
6-26-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Reid M.
6-46-3
King D.[6]
Tearney F.
6-43-66-0
Bangoura S.
Paul T.[8]
4-66-16-1
Moriya H.
Kobelt P.
6-04-1
Krueger M.
Hiltzik J.
6-36-3