Stefan Kozlov vs Daniel Nguyen — Binghamton CH Round of 16

Binghamton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Stefan Kozlov
USA3
Stefan Kozlov
#296ATP
1429ELO
1408Hard ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 July 2016
hard
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Kozlov S.
7-6 6-4
Nguyen D.
Kozlov S.
7962
Nguyen D.
6740

Stefan Kozlov defeated Daniel Nguyen 7-6 6-4 in the Binghamton CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Daniel Nguyen came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kozlov S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Nguyen D.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Kozlov S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kozlov S.Nguyen D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0
Double faults / match·Even
4.0
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 103). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kozlov S.Nguyen D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
49
37
Break points won·Even
20
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
59
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
30
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kozlov S.Nguyen D.
Freshness·
69
—

Kozlov S.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
King D.[6]
Krueger M.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
King D.[6]
Golubev A.[9]
1-66-16-3
Krueger M.
Ramanathan R.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Golubev A.[9]
Glasspool L.
6-42-66-4
King D.[6]
Kozlov S.[3]
6-24-1
Krueger M.
Moriya H.
6-37-66
Ramanathan R.
Klein B.
7-656-736-2
R16
King D.[6]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.
Statham J.
2-66-47-63
Golubev A.[9]
Crepaldi E.
6-26-1
Glasspool L.
Meister N.
6-37-67
Kozlov S.[3]
Nguyen D.
7-676-4
Moriya H.
Bangoura S.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Smith J.[4]
7-57-65
Klein B.
Vukic A.
6-746-36-1
R32
Statham J.
Clezar G.[7]
6-727-56-4
Ramanathan R.
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Vukic A.
Gomez E.
6-36-4
Klein B.
Halys Q.[1]
6-36-756-3
Smith J.[4]
Broady L.
6-746-47-5
Golubev A.[9]
King E.
7-652-66-2
Crepaldi E.
Barry S.
7-654-67-63
Meister N.
Mitchell B.
6-37-63
Glasspool L.
Rubin N.[5]
6-36-2
Kozlov S.[3]
Nevolo D.
3-67-56-0
Nguyen D.
Mmoh M.
6-26-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Reid M.
6-46-3
King D.[6]
Tearney F.
6-43-66-0
Bangoura S.
Paul T.[8]
4-66-16-1
Moriya H.
Kobelt P.
6-04-1
Krueger M.
Hiltzik J.
6-36-3