Thomas Fabbiano vs Elias Ymer — Bastad CH Round of 32

Bastad CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA4
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2016
clay
Elias Ymer
SWE
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1492Clay ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
Fabbiano T.
3-6 6-4 6-2
Ymer E.
Fabbiano T.
3662
Ymer E.
6421

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Elias Ymer 3-6 6-4 6-2 in the Bastad CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Elias Ymer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Thomas Fabbiano claimed a first win over Elias Ymer in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-06-29WimbledonQ1grassElias Ymer4-6 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Ymer E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Ymer E.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
4.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Ymer E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
48
Break points saved·Even
81
83
Break points won·Slight edge
16
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
78
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
44
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fabbiano T.Ymer E.
Freshness·
—
100

Ymer E.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zeballos H.[2]
Carballes Baena R.[5]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Zeballos H.[2]
Berlocq C.[3]
6-32-66-2
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Soderlund C.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Laaksonen H.
6-36-3
Zeballos H.[2]
Tepavac M.
7-656-4
Soderlund C.
Gimeno Traver D.
5-76-16-4
Berlocq C.[3]
Montanes A.[6]
2-66-26-3
R16
Tepavac M.
Kicker N.[8]
6-27-62
Berlocq C.[3]
Rublev A.
6-36-756-2
Montanes A.[6]
Zemlja G.
6-26-3
Gimeno Traver D.
Dustov F.
6-26-2
Soderlund C.
Fabbiano T.[4]
6-47-64
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Arvidsson I.
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.
Donskoy E.[1]
6-26-4
Zeballos H.[2]
Karatsev A.
6-26-1
R32
Zeballos H.[2]
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Karatsev A.
Ghem A.
6-46-4
Tepavac M.
Djere L.
6-36-0
Kicker N.[8]
Dubarenco M.
7-56-2
Berlocq C.[3]
Hurkacz H.
6-26-3
Rublev A.
Gunneswaran P.
6-737-57-63
Zemlja G.
Viola M.
7-51-67-62
Montanes A.[6]
Velotti A.
6-27-5
Dustov F.
Munoz de la Nava D.[7]
4-66-26-2
Gimeno Traver D.
Zopp J.
6-756-46-1
Soderlund C.
Lindell C.
7-56-2
Fabbiano T.[4]
Ymer E.
3-66-46-2
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Griekspoor S.
6-26-4
Arvidsson I.
Jankovic M.
6-27-67
Laaksonen H.
Eriksson M.
6-32-66-3
Donskoy E.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-3